Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Cellphone screens
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Cellphone screens Bookmark topic
Page12>

carkitter Posts: > 500

Why are still producing all thier latest phones with 4:3 screens?

16:9 Widescreen is as common as mud in the TV and Computer Monitor markets, why not in mobile phones?
Any one know when we'll be getting some 313x176 or 427x240 screens?


source of photo
_________________
SE and Vodafone sponsor Motorsport in OZ

If a man speaks in the woods and there's no woman to hear him, is he still wrong?

[ This Message was edited by: carkitter on 2007-04-16 04:59 ]
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 05:46:24
Edit : Quote

aatuif Posts: > 500

That would be movie specific, and then the UI will become a pain, looking at a long screen ...
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 06:47:00
Edit : Quote

carkitter Posts: > 500

Not just for movies but for browsing Esato too!
could design a phone which has a swivel screen for landscape mode - moves from candybar to + or 7 shape.

Do the Cybershot phones shoot in 16:9? My V630 doesn't but some Sony digicams/videocams do. Then I wouldn't have to stretch my photos to fit as Desktop Backgrounds.
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 07:32:27
Edit : Quote

deluded Posts: > 500

Hmm... For such a small screen, having a 16:9 ratio may not be as suitable. In portrait mode, it'll appear to be too narrow and long, in landscape mode, it'll be too wide and short.
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 08:07:45
Edit : Quote

antichrist Posts: > 500

i also agree the display is too small for 16:9
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 08:14:44
Edit : Quote

carkitter Posts: > 500

I'm not talking about having 16:9 on the 1.9 inch 4:3 aspect screens we have now, that would be unwatchable.

I'm talking about longer 16:9 ratio screens for mobile phones. This technology seems to be taking a while to trickle down considering the high quality and much lower cost of LCD TV and monitors these days.
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 09:38:21
Edit : Quote

JK Posts: > 500


On 2007-04-16 09:38:21, carkitter wrote:
I'm not talking about having 16:9 on the 1.9 inch 4:3 aspect screens we have now, that would be unwatchable.

I'm talking about longer 16:9 ratio screens for mobile phones. This technology seems to be taking a while to trickle down considering the high quality and much lower cost of LCD TV and monitors these days.



Nah the K800 screen already hurts my eyes if im chatting on im for a long time, these will make us blind!!
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 09:52:06
Edit : Quote

deluded Posts: > 500

@carkitter, I see where you're coming from, and I think there's always a possibility of having such screens on mobile phones in the future. But what's the minimum size at which an aspect ratio of 16:9 is watchable? I'm thinking it may be a bit too big for it too fit on a mobile phone, unless there's some revolutionary design.
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 12:25:00
Edit : Quote

JK Posts: > 500


On 2007-04-16 12:25:00, deluded wrote:
@carkitter, I see where you're coming from, and I think there's always a possibility of having such screens on mobile phones in the future. But what's the minimum size at which an aspect ratio of 16:9 is watchable? I'm thinking it may be a bit too big for it too fit on a mobile phone, unless there's some revolutionary design.


True but ive seen/heard that the projector will rather be introduced into mobile screens rather than larger higher res screens.

I could be wrong, but feel its the better alternative.
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 12:38:37
Edit : Quote

deluded Posts: > 500

It's possible that the projector may be incorporated into the mobile phone, but surely that can only act as a secondary output device? The primary screen would still be an LCD, and I think the discussion should be limited to the aspect ratio of this primary screen.
--
Posted: 2007-04-16 13:19:47
Edit : Quote
Page12>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home