>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> Intel vs AMD
Bookmark topic
i wanna upgrade my computers processor but i am a bit confuse to which processor i should upgrade to. My recent processor was AMD. I like speed, which should i upgrade to
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 21:48:53
Edit :
Quote
Desktop or laptop?
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 21:50:30
Edit :
Quote
is it your computer that you want to upgrade?
if it is you have to buy the same make of processer that you had before
_________________
Dupe do dupe do dupidy do(o.o)dupe do dupe do dupidy do(o.o)dupe do dupe do dupidy do(o.o)dupe do dupe do dupidy do(o.o)dupe do dupe do dupidy do(o.o)dupe do dupe do dupidy do(o.o)dupe do dupe do dupidy do(o.o)dupe do dupe do... annoying isnt it??
[ This Message was edited by: paul101 on 2007-05-20 20:54 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 21:54:14
Edit :
Quote
i have a desktop computer and it is very slow. +1600 Athlon with 256mb and a 40 gig part. hard drive. i want something that can handle Microsoft flight sim. GTA etc adobe photo shop and audtion etc
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 22:06:03
Edit :
Quote
get a core 2 duo. cheap, cheerful. intel have brought out some good stuff lately but ive always seen amd as being better, im not sure why.
dude_se
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 22:45:14
Edit :
Quote
AMD generally are better, being able to cope better with high demanding activities, such as games etc.
If you're going that way, get a 64 bit AMD processor or better.
--
Posted: 2007-05-21 12:07:16
Edit :
Quote
If you are going to just upgrade the processor than you need to know what motherboard you have and if it can take a faster processor. I think that as far as the Athlon goes 1600 is about as fast as they go anyway. This means that you will need a new motherboard, processor, fan and memory.
--
Posted: 2007-05-21 14:53:32
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-21 12:07:16, Xugaa wrote:
AMD generally are better, being able to cope better with high demanding activities, such as games etc.
If you're going that way, get a 64 bit AMD processor or better.
you're a bit behind times, Core2Duo is a leader in performance currently.
--
Posted: 2007-05-21 17:52:12
Edit :
Quote
TBH, it would be more cost efficient to replace the entire system, you could get something that will give you another 4 or 5 years or so now for under £600.
--
Posted: 2007-05-21 18:14:11
Edit :
Quote
you said you had 256mb of ram?.... THAT'S tiny
--
Posted: 2007-05-21 18:16:52
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
