>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Difference in TFT,TFD and UBC display???
Bookmark topic
Hi.please any one will explain the difference in TFT,TFD and UBC displays and also tell me which one is superior and which one in inferior.thanks
This message was posted from a W810i
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 13:24:58
Edit :
Quote
all i know is that TFD are less bright than TFT and consume a lot less power. never heard of UBC and cant find it even on wiki.
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 13:30:47
Edit :
Quote
TFT: Thin Film Transistor: LCD panel. A type of LCD flat panel display screen in which each pixel is controlled by one to four transistors. The TFT technology provides the best resolution and quality of all the flat panel techniques, but it is also the most expensive.
TFD: Thin Film Diode: Darker picture and less quality than TFT, but consumes less power overall. Not available in larger resolutions due to huge cost in volved.
UBC: well, the only possible results I had for that from a google dictionary search were: Used Beverage Containers; University of British Columbia; and the Uniform Building Code. I have never heard of any UBC screen technology.
Overall, as far as I am aware, TFT provides the best balance between quality, price, and power consumption from the ones you've listed, although LCD is better than TFT.
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 13:41:58
Edit :
Quote
UFB is Ultra Fine and Bright,which was introduced by samsung few years ago.Main advantage being,the power consumption was much lower comparable TFT's..
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 14:27:42
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-03 13:41:58, andrewkeith5 wrote:
technology.
LCD is better than TFT.
isnt TFT a type of LCD?
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 14:31:11
Edit :
Quote
and what about 'QVGA'...
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 14:35:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-03 13:41:58, andrewkeith5 wrote:
TFT: Thin Film Transistor: LCD panel. A type of LCD flat panel display screen in which each pixel is controlled by one to four transistors. The TFT technology provides the best resolution and quality of all the flat panel techniques, but it is also the most expensive.
TFD: Thin Film Diode: Darker picture and less quality than TFT, but consumes less power overall. Not available in larger resolutions due to huge cost in volved.
UBC: well, the only possible results I had for that from a google dictionary search were: Used Beverage Containers; University of British Columbia; and the Uniform Building Code. I have never heard of any UBC screen technology.
Overall, as far as I am aware, TFT provides the best balance between quality, price, and power consumption from the ones you've listed, although LCD is better than TFT.
But why when I compared (used to be) my K600 and W800 I found that the screen of K600 is better and brighter than W800? W800's screen is a little bit yellowish I think.
PS: I compared in the same brightness level.
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 14:59:05
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-03 14:35:00, aatuif wrote:
and what about 'QVGA'...
thats the resolution. 320x240
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 15:24:30
Edit :
Quote
TFD being lower quality why has SE put those type of displays in K550i & W660i. Surely these phones are on the same quality level as K750i & W600i in the past so why put in lower quality display. I just find it odd. I know it increases battery life but i would rather have better display. Anyway just a thought.
This message was posted from a 6233
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 17:35:20
Edit :
Quote
Hi again . I also have this question that if tft is better and bright than tfd , why se used tfd in w610 and k550.i mean they are not lower end phone.they are new mid range phone.i am confused
This message was posted from a W810i
--
Posted: 2007-06-03 18:34:18
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
