>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> New SE phones lack of 16M colour screen
Bookmark topic
Why SE hasn't been releasing any 16M colours phone? even in their flagship? i know they have improve alot on other aspects, but why get rid of this one?
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 02:10:30
Edit :
Quote
@sesukaku
I noticed that also although some will no doubt say it kills the battery and isn't necessary although i would like to know why no new processor chips and graphics in the W960 just the same as the P1 which is really getting old now and the W960 doesn't get HSDPA either which i find even more odd as some of the others do. So close but no cigar from me I'm afraid.
Marc
_________________
Nokia N95, 2gb Sandisk, Shure EC2g
Nokia E61 2gb Sandisk, Fring, Tom Tom 6
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-06-15 01:36 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 02:36:33
Edit :
Quote
I dont think the difference between 256k and 16m is that great to the human eye, especially on a small screen. My k800i screen looks perfect to me, any improvement over that is fine for me.
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 03:59:16
Edit :
Quote
There is not big diference betwen 16Million colors or 262K for de Human Eye.
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 04:01:07
Edit :
Quote
Does sesakuku have to go around making new threads about every little downside to SE's new phones? lol...
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 04:27:21
Edit :
Quote
according to some researches i've done, a human eye could discern up to 6 millions of colours
only, so any color depth higher than that could never been discernable. AFAIK color depths typically increases brightness thats the reason why nokia's 16m displays are very vibrant, although K800's display has proven it's excellent vibrance even in 262K colors. (see mobile-review's S40 vs A100 test)
yes i agree that 16M colors drinks battery juice faster than 262K. don't we wonder why
SAMSUNG one of the leading manufacturers of LCD display(aside from sony, LG and sharp) has only limited it
the phones display to 262K? though they can prove that it's already perfect for such viewing pleasure. nokia was the only on why tries to overthrow them but imho they can't
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 05:03:57
Edit :
Quote
@bhav and roogenial
Oh please be serious at least claim it is more intensive on battery life or it's pixelated something at least half believable. If it is no better why would any one bother producing them, i suppose by the same token HD TV is a waste as well we should all have 262k colour big TVs then.
Do you just post without actually thinking what you are saying and just how absurd a remark you are making, as long as it justifies any missing spec from SE . An explanation as to why it is no good, or not needed, really just how dumb do you think some of us actually are.
@Razec
Have you seen and used any 16m colour screens? because i know own 2 and i can tell you quite simply they are better and i don't really care how or why as that is of no importance to me. All i know is that it means i get a better viewing experience for Web, Films & Video and every other thing i look at. Also it is rubbish about them killing battery life as the E61 has the best battery life of virtually any smart phone.
Marc
_________________
Nokia N95, 2gb Sandisk, Shure EC2g
Nokia E61 2gb Sandisk, Fring, Tom Tom 6
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-06-15 04:10 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 05:04:36
Edit :
Quote
ffs.
The quality difference is very small. As in seriously damn small. That you actually care is pretty sad.
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 05:12:49
Edit :
Quote
well, i think it does not make that much different because the K850 screen size is so darn small.
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2007-06-15 04:56 ]
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 05:50:14
Edit :
Quote
May b they will eventually, though at the moment, no se has got as big as e61i in term of screen
It's their limitation, but simply quality talks over quantity
--
Posted: 2007-06-15 05:57:01
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
