Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : SE vs Nokia for Reliability?
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > SE vs Nokia for Reliability? Bookmark topic
Page123>

NotoriousZIG Posts: 71

First had a 3310 but kept on switching off. Then had a 6210 that got repaired 11 times and then got ditched (shud'v dun it earlier!) then got z7 and also have a t68i. The T68i has had a software upgrade but there was no problems with the older s/w and the z7 has never caused trouble. O2 and Tmobile are withdrawing 7210s cos they seem dodgy and everybodys giving em back. It seems to me that SE is more reliable but a lot of people have said that they have had problems with grey t68s. What do you think?
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 13:51:00
Edit : Quote

701 Posts: > 500

With t68 the menus r slow,the sms the same,damn thing is slooow:( This post was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 14:34:00
Edit : Quote

Dj Boyi Posts: > 500

Come on,t68i aint that slow! A 56k dial-up is what i call slow! This post was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 14:59:00
Edit : Quote

joran Posts: 17

having just moved from a nokia 3330 to a SE T300 the build quality is far better


should have moved earlier me thinks
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 15:32:00
Edit : Quote

Jim Posts: > 500

Strange a lot of people says that T68 is slow .... well not mine, even the T9 is quick !!!!!! I'm probably a lucky bastard
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 16:07:00
Edit : Quote

gatevital Posts: 440

The t65 is said to be slow but is faster than this user. Compared with t65 the t300 is not as solid. This post was posted from a T65
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 17:35:00
Edit : Quote

wrecked_porsche Posts: > 500

You think that is solid ? Try the r520 on for size ! Made of pure magnesium alloy. :-) This post was posted from a R520
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 18:17:00
Edit : Quote

Scoobydoo Posts: 113

I have always used Nokias for my work and bought Ericcssons for my private use. So far, I've never had an ericsson go wrong but I've had 3 fauly Nokias in 3 years.
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 21:24:00
Edit : Quote

Orka Posts: 310

Everybody knows that Nokia offers low building quality for its phones. In addition, many times Nokia's newly launched phones encounter software failures.
T68 had some software bugs in the past, but after the major software release (mms) software bugs removed. Compared to Nokia's phones, SE have better overall quality. That is the true. For medium range and entry level phones, Nokia dominates cause of its software which is more friendly. For high end phones SE dominates cause they know how do to them!
Personally right now I have the new GD87 which is awesome. Compared to both Nokia & has better quality. The software is rock stable ,very nice/impressive and friendly.
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 22:01:00
Edit : Quote

Krubach Posts: > 500

I'm not sure of what i'm going to say, and correct me if i'm wrong, but knowing that both brands have bugs in their new releases, i think that se is better 'cause they release soft updates (i.e. They admit the bugs and correct them) which are free and quick. This post was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2002-12-23 23:21:00
Edit : Quote
Page123>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home