Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : k770 vs k810i - Camera quality
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > k770 vs k810i - Camera quality Bookmark topic
Page12345678>

Karvel Posts: 6

Is there any "consensus" as to which provides the better quality images? I read that the k770 lacks an image stabiliser which results in more noise BUT the pictures show much more sharpness, image processing better on the k770 etc.? But looking at the specs it seems the k810i has the bigger sensor and has a Xeon flash.. I'm rather confused :/ I was reading in the 'post images from your k770' thread that a number of people were remarking at how sharp the images were compared to their k800/k810.

[ This Message was edited by: Karvel on 2008-02-13 15:43 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-13 16:42:33
Edit : Quote

Amras Posts: > 500

I have posted the pics comparison. K800 Vs K770 though but I see that K810 isn't that different with K800.

Since I can fwd you to the link of the post (i don't know how), I just copy the post.



*cropped from the full size images, with actual ratio*
k770


k800


full view:
k770

k800



k770

k800


k770

k800


k770

k800


k770

k800


k770

k800


all taken with k770. r8ba, taiwan. no editing, just resizing with Photoshop, save as web image.











last but not least.. it's really a superb macro in room lighting with K770. no flash.




Complete review. K800 cam vs K770's.
http://forum.wgaul.com/showthread.php?t=68196 (in Indonesian)

Assume K800 cam is the same with K810.










Full-res pics. Beware.. heavy to load.

the tiny images are just the thumbnails. click on the link to view the full-res images.

K800

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC02431.jpg
K770

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC03560.jpg


K800

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC02438.jpg
K770

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC03575.jpg


K800

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC02447.jpg
K770

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC03592.jpg


K800

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC02462.jpg
K770

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC03632.jpg


K800

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC02475.jpg
K770

http://img.photobucket.com/al[....]out%20k800%20k770/DSC03656.jpg


This one.. grainy, but sharp.



p.s. Both lens were clean of course.


_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...

[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-02-01 06:39 ]

_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...

_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...

[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-02-13 17:07 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-02-13 17:08 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-13 18:05:02
Edit : Quote

Karvel Posts: 6

So how much really does the lack of an image stabiliser/lack of Xeon flash affect the k770? I presume shooting with the k770 requires REALLY steady hands?

[ This Message was edited by: Karvel on 2008-02-13 18:17 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-13 19:11:10
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

the k770i has a major advantage in the camdriver the awful whitebalance is turned off,
this is k800i and modded driver the whitebalance is turned off
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00022.jpg

http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=9710

now i can get better colours than the k770


--
Posted: 2008-02-13 19:56:04
Edit : Quote

Vipera ammodytes Posts: > 500

K770 any day
--
Posted: 2008-02-13 20:02:30
Edit : Quote

Amras Posts: > 500


On 2008-02-13 19:11:10, Karvel wrote:
So how much really does the lack of an image stabiliser/lack of Xeon flash affect the k770? I presume shooting with the k770 requires REALLY steady hands?

[ This Message was edited by: Karvel on 2008-02-13 18:17 ]


All I can say.. the grainy pics indeed make the pics look sharper. Modded K800 cam can't even produce pics as sharp as K770's. IMHO.

The lack of an image stabiliser does quite a lot actually in night pics (but not in day pics). It requires steady hands. But as long as you lower the exposure compensation, I think it less requires steady hands.

Xenon flash makes everthing easy in taking night pics. So the lack of Xenon flash results the other way.

I think if you take a lot of macro/day pics, choose K770. Otherwise, choose K800/K810.


--
Posted: 2008-02-13 20:19:35
Edit : Quote

gh05t Posts: 38

k770 lacks purple fringing or at least it's not that visible. I am really surprised by the quality of those k770 shots, because the camera sensor i smaller.
--
Posted: 2008-02-13 20:40:29
Edit : Quote

SaLiH Posts: 460

@Karvel

I have the same doubts as you, I can't decide if I should sell my K800i and replace it with K770i.

Here is a link comparing K810i with K770i

http://www.tehnozona.bg/?mod=news&article=964

K810i vs. K770i
--
Posted: 2008-02-13 21:25:54
Edit : Quote

sadeghi85 Posts: 341

image stabilizer in camphones is just software based. it won't help really. you can ignore it.
--
Posted: 2008-02-13 21:36:33
Edit : Quote

Radiux399 Posts: 246


On 2008-02-13 19:56:04, number1 wrote:
the k770i has a major advantage in the camdriver the awful whitebalance is turned off,
this is k800i and modded driver the whitebalance is turned off
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00022.jpg

http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=9710

now i can get better colours than the k770




The colors might be better with the modded driver K800, but you can't turn off that awful noise reduction algorithm that smears fine details out of existence. This is one of the biggest advantages of the K770/T650.



K770 on left, K800 on right.
--
Posted: 2008-02-14 00:39:36
Edit : Quote
Page12345678>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home