>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> MOTO Z9 official pics
Bookmark topic
via CellPassion.
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 21:28:20
Edit :
Quote
looks okay...
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 21:36:50
Edit :
Quote
don't like it personally...
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 21:39:15
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-03-18 21:36:50, gola wrote:
looks okay...
I don't think so
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 21:41:40
Edit :
Quote
Unless this has specs to impress, their doomed.
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 21:43:33
Edit :
Quote
I think the real phone would look much better,but it still has got only 2mp camera.But motorola's cam are of very poor quality.Judging from the device it looks like rokr e8 with a slide form,which is mainly focused on music
From cellpassiion
For starters, it supports HSDPA 3.6 Mbps and WCDMA 850/1900 Mhz! It has inbuilt AGPS capabilities and we’d like to believe that Moto will be packing a mammoth 8GB microSD card in the pack. Rest of the specs include:
Weight: 140 gram
Dimension: 114 x 53.6 x 13.9 mm
Display: 2.4 inch, 262,144 colour QVGA
Camera: 2 megapixel with 8X digital zoom
Memory: 45 MB
Bluetooth 2.0
USB 2.0
Opera 8/ WAP 2.0 web browser
Battery: 950 mAh
Standby/Talk time: Up to 4 hours/315 hours
That’s not all folks, Moto will be pitching it against the Nokia 6500 and Samsung U700, so you can get a fair idea of what it’d be priced like.
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 21:49:52
Edit :
Quote
WTF? I thought that with that thickness and weight, I would have at least 8 gigs of memory! Come on, the W910 has similar specs and is twice as thin!
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-03-18 21:15 ]
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 22:14:06
Edit :
Quote
moto always seem to have crappy cameras, most newly announced handset from samsung, sony etc have 3-5 mpix software is also better. moto maybe had the first handset that was truly innotative v3 being thin but they need to innovate by creating handsets with better specs the v8 is a start nice materials but the handset is quite fat and it cud ov done with the 3.2 mpix or 5 mpix, no wonder there in trouble lol
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 22:33:43
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-03-18 22:14:06, NightBlade wrote:
WTF? I thought that with that thickness and weight, I would have at least 8 gigs of memory! Come on, the W910 has similar specs and is twice as thin!
Let me see:
W910: 99 x 50 x
12.5 mm
Z9: 114 x 53.6 x
13.9 mm
Did you leave school after like, the second day? "Twice as thin", yeah right
--
Posted: 2008-03-18 22:35:55
Edit :
Quote
That looks good. And no its not twice as thick as W910 as some blind ignorant people here think
--
Posted: 2008-03-20 09:56:21
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
