>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Is k850's videos so bad?
Bookmark topic
I don't know why a phone with 5megapixels camera is so bad because i watched a video where the quality suxs.
Even n73 is better.
is that true?
--
Posted: 2008-04-16 19:21:22
Edit :
Quote
5MP has nothing to do with the video recording capabilities.. it records at QVGA.
And yeh quality isn't that great, still quite some visible pixels when moving the cam, especially in low light.
But the 30fps is nice and it's a lot better than k800s
--
Posted: 2008-04-16 19:28:12
Edit :
Quote
could find more info here:
How is the video playback on the K850i?
--
Posted: 2008-04-16 19:42:38
Edit :
Quote
generally nokia videos are better then se imo i made some really great vids once with 6233. not to mention n95 vids, thoes are really awsome
--
Posted: 2008-04-17 02:56:14
Edit :
Quote
crossmatched Posts: > 500
w900's video is better in colors and speed than k850's
--
Posted: 2008-04-17 20:51:57
Edit :
Quote
Almost each K850 that i have seen, could not record higher than 15fps average... (except for the first 3 or 4 seconds)
This is a very annoying BUG.
--
Posted: 2008-04-17 21:49:03
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-04-17 20:51:57, crossmatched wrote:
w900's video is better in colors and speed than k850's
But the audio codec is lower quality. W900 records in AMR audio. K850 in AAC.
--
Posted: 2008-04-17 21:49:21
Edit :
Quote
crossmatched Posts: > 500
@amras
yup. true. but video being "moving pictures", i would prefer to have smooth and nicely colored moving pics
--
Posted: 2008-04-17 22:17:21
Edit :
Quote
I dont Know how is the video Quality on Nokia Phones or w900, but I m very happy with my k850, I dont use k850 too much for rec videos, but for the fews I rec, I can say they are very nice
--
Posted: 2008-04-18 01:40:49
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
