>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902
Bookmark topic
NOKIA 6220 & SONYERICSSON C902
1st Pic is for 6220 the 2nd for C902
[ This Message was edited by: Pop Lover on 2008-05-19 13:28 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Pop Lover on 2008-05-19 13:29 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 14:26:55
Edit :
Quote
http://publish.it168.com/2008/0519/20080519005901.shtml (translated by google)
[ This Message was edited by: sadeghi85 on 2008-05-19 14:01 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 14:57:44
Edit :
Quote
nokia have much better picture quality..sad but true
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 15:13:39
Edit :
Quote
From that, C902 has a pathetic camera, really really pathetic.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 15:15:26
Edit :
Quote
OMG that Nokia is hideous!
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 15:48:55
Edit :
Quote
As much as I hate saying this but, Nokia has much better quality pictures!
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 16:00:58
Edit :
Quote
How can the C902 be branded a cybershot... those pics are disappointing... and its unlikely they will get better since this handset is due to be released within 2 months...
Not good at all
Cheers
ENJOY
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 16:03:17
Edit :
Quote
I thought the K850 was gonna be the only failure, but it seems that there's another one in the works.
Naz is right... how can this even be branded Cybershot? Those pictures are horrid considering its a camera phone. I mean, what the hell are SE doing with their Cybershot phones?
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 16:15:28
Edit :
Quote
can't see the photos....
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 16:20:27
Edit :
Quote
The c902 pic quality is awful it has less pic detail than my k800 also colours are horrible and incorrect.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 16:27:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
