Esato Forums - General discussions : Other manufacturers : HTC Touch Diamond vs. Samsung i900 Omnia: Head-to-Head :Review-Gsmarena

Index Menu

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Other manufacturers > HTC Touch Diamond vs. Samsung i900 Omnia: Head-to-Head :Review-Gsmarena Bookmark topic

Page12 >

technical-expert Posts: > 500

HTC Touch Diamond vs. Samsung i900 Omnia: Head-to-Head

http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_t[....]sung_i900_omnia-review-262.php

Bought to u First on Esato By TECHNICAL EXPERT

TECHNICAL EXPERT
Always Bringing u the Latest Information & Updates

[ This Message was edited by: technical-expert on 2008-07-02 14:15 ]

[ This Message was edited by: technical-expert on 2008-07-02 14:19 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-02 15:12:18
Edit : Quote

apolloa Posts: > 500

Well I'll reply

Just looked through, very good review, I do like the Diamond still gggrrrrr. I don't know as they have done a lot to get rid of the crappy Windows interface. SE seems to have done a fantastic job with the X1 though in this area. But the touch has a rubbish battery, trade off for the size?
--
Posted: 2008-07-02 16:20:03
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500

No technical expert opinions on it? shocking

_________________
say hi to my widow for me

[ This Message was edited by: QVGA on 2008-07-02 17:01 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-02 18:01:01
Edit : Quote

Peio Posts: 152

Nice review
Just a word about those words in "omnia over diamond":

"
# Landscape QWERTY keyboard (Diamond has one but only in browser)
# Auto screen rotation is available in all applications and can be switched off
"

That's not true anymore, there's now a little program called "Gsen" that allows auto screen rotation in every application, using the G-sensor. I don't get why HTC didn't activate it by default though

--
Posted: 2008-07-03 10:09:47
Edit : Quote

Dups! Posts: > 500

For me design-wise the Samsung wins. As for other things I would have to mix and match but the HTC would provide a bulk of the features.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 13:42:44
Edit : Quote

pmerryman Posts: > 500

Looks wise, I would have to say the HTC Touch Diamond, as I think the samsung have copied some of the looks of the iphone.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 13:46:03
Edit : Quote

himlims_nl Posts: > 500

still both got slow menu's due the use of WM
aaarght hurry up with your android release
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 13:51:27
Edit : Quote

Dups! Posts: > 500

@pmerryman

True, but they made the design look even better than the iphone IMO. I just love it!

_________________

GH688, MC 6000 DeskTop Charger, R320s, R600s.

P910i.
Motorola v8.

[ This Message was edited by: EMS06 on 2008-07-03 12:55 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 13:52:54
Edit : Quote

anonymuser Posts: > 500

On 2008-07-03 13:51:27, himlims_nl wrote:
still both got slow menu's due the use of WM
aaarght hurry up with your android release

There's nothing inherently slow about WM - in fact if they stripped off all their own Touch guff and just used the WM interface, both phones would be lightning fast. It's the optimisation of their own software that's the problem here, and will doubtless dog their first Android efforts too.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 14:12:40
Edit : Quote

pmerryman Posts: > 500

On 2008-07-03 13:52:54, EMS06 wrote:
@pmerryman

True, but they made the design look even better than the iphone IMO. I just love it!

_________________

GH688, MC 6000 DeskTop Charger, R320s, R600s.

P910i.
Motorola v8.

[ This Message was edited by: EMS06 on 2008-07-03 12:55 ]

IMO alot of the samsungs look very similar, and this one fits into this category.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 14:34:47
Edit : Quote

Page12 >

New Topic Reply