>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> Nokia 6220 Classic or SE C902 ?
Bookmark topic
Which is better ?
Want a phone that is good for txting, and general use. And is fast. i.e fast menus
and a good camera
Thanks
max
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 20:24:35
Edit :
Quote
The nokia is way better at taking nice pictures and videos.
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 21:41:18
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-10 21:41:18, xironghostx wrote:
The nokia is way better at taking nice pictures and videos.
Yet, it's pretty darn ugly...
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 21:44:40
Edit :
Quote
While the C902 is a beut!
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 21:51:51
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-10 21:44:40, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-07-10 21:41:18, xironghostx wrote:
The nokia is way better at taking nice pictures and videos.
Yet, it's pretty darn ugly...
yeah yeah we get it already. you have the same one liner for all nokia related phones.
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 21:56:47
Edit :
Quote
I would suggest...
Check the reviews out and see what you think...
There will be advantages and disadvantages to both models, it all depends what you can handle...
Cheers

ENJOY
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 21:57:17
Edit :
Quote
You might have to carry a microscope to look at that itsy bitsy screen the C902 has.
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 23:38:26
Edit :
Quote
there is a nice review to the cheap looking nokia 6220. check this out:
http://3lib.ukonline.co.uk/sshow/ss63.html
--
Posted: 2008-07-19 17:02:00
Edit :
Quote
I think the C902 takes awesome pics for a 10 mm phone. Check out the cam pic section .Everyone seems to take good pics with it.
--
Posted: 2008-07-19 18:03:59
Edit :
Quote
Beauty and the beast- I would take the beast (Nokia). It actually is the beast in performance too.
--
Posted: 2008-07-19 18:16:17
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply