>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K850 Vs C902...(pictures)
Bookmark topic
thought i start a new thread..(the c902 thread is just for c902 pics i think)
so here you go:
...(i tried some document shooting on landscape, nature with c902,,,woooaaahhh, what a sharpness it became)
super sharpness c902 vs k850
k850
c902
document c902...little to low EV... really nice thick colors / shadows
now starts my c902 to produce good colors... they are little better then k850(even indoor)
taken in quite low light
c902
k850
c902
k850
the photo flash is not super crapy...it still better then c702/N95 (ordinary) LED technique.... but if i stand 3-4m away Xenon kills like nothing.
here 2m...you see my dear C902 laying there waiting for the unknown..he he
c902
k850
c902...daylight
k850
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-16 22:40 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 11:24:38
Edit :
Quote
no big winner if you'd ask me
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 12:58:36
Edit :
Quote
agree, but C902 is 10mm and K850 is 18mm, so I would buy C902 instead of K850.
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 13:33:01
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-16 11:24:38, plankgatan wrote:
thought i start a new thread..(the c902 thread is just for c902 pics i think)
so here you go:
...(i tried some document shooting on landscape, nature with c902,,,woooaaahhh, what a sharpness it became)
super sharpness c902 vs k850
You need to post full size photos for a true comparison of sharpness. Downsized photos will show exposure and color.
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 14:29:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-16 14:29:13, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2008-07-16 11:24:38, plankgatan wrote:
thought i start a new thread..(the c902 thread is just for c902 pics i think)
so here you go:
...(i tried some document shooting on landscape, nature with c902,,,woooaaahhh, what a sharpness it became)
super sharpness c902 vs k850
You need to post full size photos for a true comparison of sharpness. Downsized photos will show exposure and color.
Fair comparison would be at a resolution at which people view their photos, which is what plank posted. No one here, i'm pretty sure, has a monitor running at 2500x1200 resolution so taking a pic at that resolution is pointless. It may tell the true story about the camera, but its pointless.
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 14:40:53
Edit :
Quote
Again new topic?!? ccc
You open one...
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=172504
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 15:01:35
Edit :
Quote
hi plank...
nice comparison...
i think that you can now admit that the K850 camera driver has a very bad problem with RED colours...
and please,.......please,,, don't resize your pictures with paint.
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 15:12:33
Edit :
Quote
K850 pics sucks,bigtime!!c902 can produce far better colours...
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 16:14:44
Edit :
Quote
Nice improvement over K850i, good comparison.
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 20:01:15
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-16 14:40:53, QVGA wrote:
Fair comparison would be at a resolution at which people view their photos, which is what plank posted. No one here, i'm pretty sure, has a monitor running at 2500x1200 resolution so taking a pic at that resolution is pointless. It may tell the true story about the camera, but its pointless.
That depends on what you do with your photos. Yes, if you never print them but always view on your monitor, then the 5 MP (and the 8 MP of the C905!) is wasted space. The instruction "Click on photo to view in full size" under each photo in the
Photos gallery is probably always ignored. But every pixel counts for those of us that like to print the odd photo that turn out great and sometimes then at larger sizes (A4, 10R or larger).
We can turn this the other way. Which size should be used to allow
everyone to view photos without using scrollbars? There are probably a lot of users out there that view this site on their phones. They may be content with thumbnails and anything fancier than the T610 with its 0.1 MP camera is too much for them.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-07-16 19:12 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 20:11:37
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
