Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : G900 or N82?
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > G900 or N82? Bookmark topic
Page12345678>

awakenshadow Posts: 56

I am getting a new contract, and the phones that I am really looking at are SE G900 and the Nokia N82. I really love the fact that G900 got a touch screen, but worried about the camera/video camera quality; apparently they aren't very good compared to that of the Nokia N82.

Which one would you go for?
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 18:41:57
Edit : Quote

technical-expert Posts: > 500

I have carefully analyzed ur query
I would like to suggest that, G900s still camera picture quality is very much below average.in sharpness contrast colors etc.And we all know that which has better video recording.the only upside in G900 is touchscreen which u wouldn't be using as much as u would imagine.

So if ur average user wanting mid range phone & willing to compromise some functions for looks & touchscreen features G900 is the pick

If u like high tech features & need good camera/Video capabilities, support for dedicated headphones, gps, large enough ram & greater processing speeds, ability to run as many third party applications etc then N82 is the way to go

Personally my recommendations goes for n82

Best regards.
TECHNICAL EXPERT
ROCK SOLID EXPERTISE, BREATHTAKING SOLUTIONS


--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:00:57
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500

Oh, gimme a break...
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:04:21
Edit : Quote

awakenshadow Posts: 56

Is the N82 really bricky and heavy? photos only tell half the story...
Thanks again
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:11:08
Edit : Quote

technical-expert Posts: > 500

not at all, i haven't seen anyone claiming N82 as brick.If u compare it with aK750, it slimmer than 3mm & little taller & slightly wider than K750 because of 2.4 inch screen

h 100 x W 46 x D 20.5 mm 99 g -k750
112 x 50.2 x 17.3 mm, 114 g - N82

Regards,
TECHNICAL EXPERT
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:20:54
Edit : Quote

Intrigue Posts: 31


On 2008-08-08 19:11:08, awakenshadow wrote:
Is the N82 really bricky and heavy? photos only tell half the story...
Thanks again


No,don't say it again,it will cause war.
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:22:52
Edit : Quote

awakenshadow Posts: 56

no offence, but nokia have a tradition of making brick phones; especially some of the N-series. N95 is definitely a brick and N73 etc. they are not sleek and elegent.
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:26:19
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500


On 2008-08-08 19:26:19, awakenshadow wrote:
no offence, but nokia have a tradition of making brick phones; especially some of the N-series. N95 is definitely a brick and N73 etc. they are not sleek and elegent.

Ditto.
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:28:45
Edit : Quote

Mizzle Posts: > 500


On 2008-08-08 19:20:54, technical-expert wrote:
not at all, i haven't seen anyone claiming N82 as brick.If u compare it with aK750, it slimmer than 3mm & little taller & slightly wider than K750 because of 2.4 inch screen

h 100 x W 46 x D 20.5 mm 99 g -k750
112 x 50.2 x 17.3 mm, 114 g - N82

Regards,
TECHNICAL EXPERT


You do realize the 20 mm is at the thickest point, right? Everywhere else along its body, it's 17 mm.
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:29:13
Edit : Quote

awakenshadow Posts: 56

Is the G900 really slow? i have read somewhere that theres a 7 second wait between taking pictures, is that true?
--
Posted: 2008-08-08 19:36:33
Edit : Quote
Page12345678>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home