Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : C702 vs. C902 vs. G900
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > C702 vs. C902 vs. G900 Bookmark topic
Page123>

Belaga91 Posts: 2

I'm trying to decided which one I should get and I cannot seem to come to a conclusion. I like the durability of the C702. I like the 5 mp and feel of the C902. The G900 just seems relatively similar, so I have to throw it into the mix. It'd be great if any of you guys could give me your personal opinion or a testimonial on any or all phones. Thanks.

What's your vote?
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 23:02:50
Edit : Quote

adnansanni Posts: > 500

My vote goes to C902.
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 23:12:00
Edit : Quote

Luci'sPower Posts: > 500

same here...but G900 isn't bat either
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 23:17:51
Edit : Quote

xironghostx Posts: > 500

The Picturequality from the g900 is nowhere close the c902 imo.
--
Posted: 2008-10-27 23:30:50
Edit : Quote

ocean21 Posts: 217

Get the C902, better build quality. Moreover, I don't think you should get the G900. Symbian UIQ is dying soon. I said soon, not now.
--
Posted: 2008-10-28 05:01:43
Edit : Quote

gtr83 Posts: > 500

Although I own a C702 but I'll have to say that it's not that durable, C902's slim full metal armor is better in more ways than one. But it still manages to capture my fanboyism, just like those rookie football players!

On a serious note, the C702's A200 is a lot simpler than G900 but if you really like a small smartphone then it's G900.
--
Posted: 2008-10-28 17:29:58
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500

I wouldnt go near a UIQ phone with a 20ft pole.
--
Posted: 2008-10-28 18:05:45
Edit : Quote

Leyland Posts: 15

I had a chance to own C702 for a short time, about a week, I did like that phone is dust and splash resistant but quaility built was not that good, they used cheap plastic, very annoying thing are buttons on keypad, not comfortable enough to text ( if you are in to texting ) I do own C902 which is a bit different than C702 in quality built as well as design and look, ( OK C702 is 3.2 megapixel camera and C902 is 5 megapixel ) have some metal parts and it feels bit more compact, annoying thing about C902 is screen which is kind a small, should be bit bigger ( C702 got bit bigger screen ) also I am annoyed about battery life, goes very quickly if you do use it for texting and talking, still haven't figure it out when you listen music or watching videos but I can bet it will go quickly for sure. G900 I heard lot of good things about it but never had chance to see it in real life. My vote goes for C902. Good luck in chosing your new phone.
--
Posted: 2008-10-29 16:05:36
Edit : Quote

Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500

Of those phones, the C902 has the best picture quality and best build quality (and in my opinion it is an amazing looker).

The C702 has GPS and a slightly bigger screen than the C902. Apparently the build quality isn't too flash though. The looks are questionable, but they do grow on you.

The G900 seems to have the worst picture quality (SE tends to put more effort into making the Cyber-shot branded ones the best in their range), but it has the advantage of having the biggest screen and being a smartphone, if that appeals to you. The styling of the G900 seems pretty bland to me though.
--
Posted: 2008-10-29 16:24:53
Edit : Quote

gtr83 Posts: > 500

The G900's main advantages are being a smartphone and a very small one at that. Touch focus and doesn't improve photo quality that much. C902 is a lot better in the camera department, although there are some parts that gather dust too easily.
--
Posted: 2008-10-29 16:33:50
Edit : Quote
Page123>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home