Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Not impressed with SE's current offerings
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Not impressed with SE's current offerings Bookmark topic
Page12345>

tbroe Posts: 278

Currently, I need a new phone. My W910 is really starting to annoy me big time.

As I've said in the title, I don't really like what SE are offering. The W595 has a bad camera and is made from rather cheap plastic. I quite like the W902, but it's rather expensive and I'm a bit bored of SE tbh.

I really like the Samsung Soul. It fits the bill for me. It's slim, nice looking, slider, good camera with af and flash, made out of decent materials totaling more than 1p etc etc

Anybody else share my feelings? Or are Sony Ericsson just not appealing to 16 yr olds that want a decent phone?

Oh and anyone know where I can get a soul cheap??
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 22:41:53
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500

The C905 does it for me.
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 22:43:18
Edit : Quote

Mr Miyagi Posts: > 500

personally i think the soul is chunky. nothing slim about it.
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 22:48:34
Edit : Quote

tbroe Posts: 278

Yeahh but it's rather thick, and a bit expensive for me, but the slider mechanism seems very nice.

But yeahh a bit thick for me tbh.
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 22:52:07
Edit : Quote

Mr Miyagi Posts: > 500

what about the samsung g600 in grey or pink?
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 22:53:02
Edit : Quote

tbroe Posts: 278


On 2008-11-23 22:48:34, Mr Miyagi wrote:
personally i think the soul is chunky. nothing slim about it.


Yeahh I see what you mean...but it'll fit in your pocket.
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 22:53:35
Edit : Quote

tbroe Posts: 278

The g600 is rather thick...much more than the soul, and certainly not in pink lol
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 22:56:45
Edit : Quote

Mr Miyagi Posts: > 500

ok what about the nokia 6300? its a slim handset. looks nice too? it looks really good in black? or the 6500 slide in black? or silver if u like silver? (black is my preference though)
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 22:59:10
Edit : Quote

tbroe Posts: 278

Yeahh but its a bit basic if im honest. And lacks the wow factor of the soul.
--
Posted: 2008-11-23 23:03:31
Edit : Quote

enk39 Posts: 120

@mr miyagi-"nothing slim about it"-12.9mm isn't slim? the motorola v3 was 13.7mm. albeit the rest of the u900 is quite "chunky"

wel i used to have a soul( i mean the phone , still have my soul ) and to be honest i didn't get the "wow" factor from it. I don't know samsung's UI just isn't my thing mayb. The design to me seemed.....classy, sensible, well made(very) but just a bit too understated i felt. and the touchpad worked really well but usage wise doesn't really add anything imho.
And since you mentioned the camera....it's great outdoors. But indoors it's really underpar. The camera's refresh rate/shutter speed is slow as well,when you activate the flash the shutter speed gets seriously slow( i think like 1 second apparently, don't quote me on that though) and i always ended up with blurred images, mind you my hands aren't the most stable(but hey it's all relative since i own a n82 nw wif xenon)

But yea if the camera isn't a priority and the design appeals to you, then i would still recommend it, just that it happened to bore me very quickly
Or hw about the c902...the build quality at least seems good...


[ This Message was edited by: enk39 on 2008-11-24 02:13 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-24 02:40:34
Edit : Quote
Page12345>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home