>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SE C905 vs Canon EOS 350! Camera Shoot-out !
Bookmark topic
Hi,
I borrowed Canon EOS 350 a really great 8 Mpix digital camera (camera of the year 2006 I think) and took some pictures with both EOS 350 and my Sony Ericsson C905. I can't post full size pictures here thats why I created an account att google mail with name c905mobilforum and password SonyEricsson. There You can find FULL SIZE pictures taken both with EOS350 and C905. Here are what You can expect if You download full size pictures to compare on Your own.
Pictures here are 8Mpix pictures resized to 700x500 pix and You can see only a half of a picture
I Tried to take pictures of different things and in different light conditions.
What You can see HERE is NOT really right comparision. To really compare images (cameras) You have to download FULL SIZE pictures that I have in my mail, and that is mail.google.com
Log in with user name: c905mobilforum
and password: SonyEricsson
Download pictures to Your computer and compare.
This is NOT a professional comparision. I just have some free time and I decided to do something fun.
My oppinion si that Canon is of course better but C905 phone is allmost as good as Canon.
If You want to really test it, download pictures put side-by-side and ask someone else. I asked my girlfriend, she guessed 50% right
Or if You wont to take it even furhter order prints and compare it on paper
Comments are Welcome
--
Posted: 2009-03-16 21:59:31
Edit :
Quote
nice comparison and surprisingly the c905 wins in some of the images, e.g. the candle and skin-tone.
the canon just clinches it back with the picture of the lady seems somewhat sharper
good work
--
Posted: 2009-03-16 22:02:55
Edit :
Quote
so you mean this camera:
beats this camera........am I right ??????????
nice comparison but VERY weird result
--
Posted: 2009-03-16 22:12:25
Edit :
Quote
barareklam,so which camera produced more accurate colours according to u? Since you have seen them live.
--
Posted: 2009-03-16 22:15:29
Edit :
Quote
I mean that CANON IS BETTER bu c905 is not far behind.
Look at the FULL size images att mail.google.com
login: c905mobilforum
pass: SonyEricsson
Please do NOT compare resized half-pictures but ORIGINAL images !!!
--
Posted: 2009-03-16 22:22:56
Edit :
Quote
I see. I was thinking the colours of c905 looked better, so wanted to know which one was more accurate. Thanks.
--
Posted: 2009-03-16 22:26:27
Edit :
Quote
edit..........
C905 is behind indoor and lowlight against EOS BIG sensor and optic, (anything else should be weird)
outdoor in sunshine there is c905 more similar.......thats my opinion
no offence man. still fun with camera shoot-outs
keep up the good work
edit again.....
yes. i agree with you Luci...very nice comparison....c905 is no bad shooter,, macro is very good, also indoor with better light.
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-16 21:40 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-16 22:27:17
Edit :
Quote
really nice comparison thanks for shering
--
Posted: 2009-03-16 22:35:27
Edit :
Quote
I had one of them
there are some knockouts like in details amount and ISO-to-noise ratio. auto white balance in EOS is very good, except of problems in artificial light
EOS close-up pics are blurry? no, the key to understand this pics lies in strong relation of aperture size and depth of field. with fixed f/2.8 in C905 you don't have to care about such a things
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-03-16 23:17 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 00:15:59
Edit :
Quote
did u really bother focusing the EOS 350...coz most of its pics appear out of focus and hence they don't look as good
in the real world...it would be impossible for a camera with the sensor size which is used in C905 to be able to compare forget beat the quality of pics of a DSLR!! C'mon!!!
I am not saying C905 is a bad camphone..infact i reckon its one of the best so far...but there is no way it can compare to a DSLR....there are hardly if any normal digital compacts that would either!
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 01:53:44
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
