Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Shootout: C702 vs C902 vs N95
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Shootout: C702 vs C902 vs N95 Bookmark topic
Page12345>

blerk Posts: > 500

All phones running the latest available firmware with stock drivers, no modifications.

A tripod has been used for the landscape pictures.

1: Landscape taken in the shade.
2: Landscape taken in the sun.
3: Landscape taken in the sun.
4: Macro taken in the sun.
5: Macro taken in the sun (the C702 has a weird glow which is probably caused by me).
6: Macro taken in the shade.
7: Macro taken in the shade.
8: Macro taken indoors.

100% crops will be added soon, if someone wants to do it that is fine with me



C702


C902


N95




C702


C902


N95




C702


C902


N95




C702


C902


N95




C702


C902


N95




C702


C902


N95




C702


C902


N95




C702


C902


N95



Full size pictures can be found here: http://se.0x0f.net/shootout
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-04-30 07:07 ]

--
Posted: 2009-04-29 23:53:11
Edit : Quote

Coquito Posts: > 500

You put C905, it's not C902?
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 01:24:50
Edit : Quote

ardzuna Posts: 467

The EXIF shows that it really is C902, but he probably made a mistake and wrote C905 instead.
Judging by these resized photos, C702 looks the best to me.

--
Posted: 2009-04-30 01:42:17
Edit : Quote

gtr83 Posts: > 500

The N95 seems to come out on top only on the last pic. But it may be just me and my monitor.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 01:59:16
Edit : Quote

razec Posts: > 500


On 2009-04-30 01:59:16, gtr83 wrote:
The N95 seems to come out on top only on the last pic. But it may be just me and my monitor.


Indeed, N95 was the best on the last one, other than that C902 rules the colour rendering. but taking into account that the resolved details due to the stronger jpeg compression on both 5mp phones were lower than the C702 the latter isn't that bad.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 04:33:17
Edit : Quote

blerk Posts: > 500

Yeah sorry guys, it should be C902

I'd have to add the weather was optimal yesterday, very sunny and bright. I would like to take some more pictures in less perfect conditions.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 08:09:22
Edit : Quote

georgied Posts: 156

N95 looks the sharpest but the colour is a bit washed out. C702 looks to have the more vibrant colour but a bit fuzzy. C902 looks to be the happy medium, imho anyway...
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 11:36:03
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

Based on the first set of landscape pics, the C702 & C902 did quite well , hope you didn't spend to much on that digicam, because it's shots are quite poor.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 11:38:27
Edit : Quote

blerk Posts: > 500

Most of colours can be easily fixed to a more natural look by adjusting the levels in photoshop, even just using auto-levels makes for great improvements in the N95.

@number1 don't worry, I paid less than 90 pounds for the Lumix including 4gb sd card, the images are ok for it's small size. Sometimes it needs a little tweaking, which shots are poor, or all shots are poor?

I've just printed an (18x13) album and sent it to my family back home, it looks fine. It also has some pictures taken by my old C702 and K800i in there, all looking fine printed

I think for its price you get very nice specs in a small (10x5x2cm) package. I really like the starry night 10/30/60 seconds shutter times, they make for great night shots.
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-04-30 11:06 ]

--
Posted: 2009-04-30 11:45:01
Edit : Quote

alexslane Posts: 439

hmmmm nice to see the c702 and c902 holding there own with the n95 dude , the pics to be fair that came off the c902 are very very good .

--
Posted: 2009-04-30 12:01:30
Edit : Quote
Page12345>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home