>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> C905 pics compared to K800i
Bookmark topic
I have read on a few other forums that pics taken on the C905 are not much better than the K800i surely this is rubbish?
C905 pics look great and people pics using the darkmagician camdriver look amazing.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 21:48:02
Edit :
Quote
yes, that was surely case....
But with old firmware specially with R1BA038 which produce much noise on saved pics.
Latest firmware R1DA032 have great improvement in compression from raw to jpg and noticeably less noise in shadows
which is still present to be visible.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 22:39:34
Edit :
Quote
c905 is MUCH better then K800, even MUCH better than K850i...
--
Posted: 2009-05-01 09:51:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-05-01 09:51:59, barareklam wrote:
c905 is MUCH better then K800, even MUCH better than K850i...
yes it is,
but with older firmware versions quality of pics really sucks.. Look at this old thread
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=179665&start=0
--
Posted: 2009-05-01 10:55:41
Edit :
Quote
it's almost 5MP more than in K800, so we should expect much more and better details on pictures from C905. I didn't found 'much more' but pictures still looks very good if you downscale them to 3MP just to compare with K800 pictures. poor details are bottleneck of C905, everything else is just better
--
Posted: 2009-05-01 11:10:48
Edit :
Quote
Actually shouldn't the amount of details roughly depend on mega-pixels / sensor size. Just increasing the MP with the same sensor size will just decrease the quality (even taking into account advances in sensor technology).
--
Posted: 2009-05-04 06:35:34
Edit :
Quote
Pictures ARE much better. I have K800 and c905 and they are much better. I hade k850i too and c905 takes better pictures. I like photography so I took hundreds of pictures and I assure You details are much better!
--
Posted: 2009-05-04 08:34:41
Edit :
Quote
maybe small pictures comparision?
--
Posted: 2009-05-04 11:02:00
Edit :
Quote
well. Readerski have a point.
compare a:
K750 with only 2 megapixels
against a
K800 with 3.2 megapixels
against a
K850 with 5 megapixels
against a
C905 with 8.1 megapixels
(in full size of course)
does it tells anything ????????
its a
much easier job for the K750-camera to sort up 2 m.p. then 8 m.p.
(not even N82, ZN5, C902, 8510 have a chance against K750 in full size,
thats your answer !
your second answer is that in normal size C905 looks better, because when you shrink 8.1 m.p. into 1024 x 768 it looks very solid and nice
edit.
so in that point i agree c905 looks better.....how many times do you use your cellphone pics in full size ???? (NEVER)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-04 12:03 ]
--
Posted: 2009-05-04 12:52:41
Edit :
Quote
On c905 You can choose to take picture in VGA (640x480) up to 8.1 Mpix
If You take picture with 3 Mpix and compare it to same picture taken with K800, well C905 IS still better!
--
Posted: 2009-05-04 14:32:23
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
