>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> W810i Or C510 Camera Picture Quality ?
Bookmark topic
Which has the best quality ???
I suspect W810i.
--
Posted: 2009-05-26 21:31:46
Edit :
Quote
in full sunshine i get good pics with my old w810
c510 have a bit more smooth picture-quality(similar to c702), w810 is more to K750 (a lot of colours when its optimal light)
best allround camera have easily c510. but w810 is just slightly behind (and like i said, great in good light)
ps. one thing who is lightyears better on c510 is of course the lens cover. (my w810 (like most older w810) have got scratches on the lens and the UV-film is nearly gone)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-26 22:28 ]
--
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:22:32
Edit :
Quote
i find it's actually the other way round outdoors, i much prefer the c510 pics are sharp and pretty well detailed, but in low-light i much rather the w810, the c510 has a smaller aperture so low light pics are alot more difficult the w810 has a bigger aperture and less megapixels on it's sensor so low-light pics are actually very good compared to most camphones miles better than the c510. Best all round is the w810 .
--
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:24:25
Edit :
Quote
i get shitty lowlight with my w810 (just for the record
ps.........buy a k800/k810 or c902/w902 if you want good(better) lowlight
pss.........i understand what you mean though, Nr.1.
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-26 22:34 ]
--
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:30:13
Edit :
Quote
Your the only 1 , my k750 was the only phonecam i could actually use in low-light , i guess you prefer smeared to hell rather than sharp and detailed thats why you have a c902.
--
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:34:38
Edit :
Quote
wait a minute...that's 2 different things.
i have both a cid36 k750 (bought it same week it was release here) and a w810 (cid49 or cid52 i dont know). and its BIG different between them in lowlight (just for the record
and yes, C902/w902 have excellent lowlight with a bit skill (especially up to ~iso-250...further it gets a bit harder)
(i call this sharp and well detailed lowlight quality)
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19574[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-26 22:51 ]
--
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:39:50
Edit :
Quote
I had a old cid:36 k750 ,Not much difference between that and the w810 very very simlar sony 2mp cammodule, results are also very much the same.
Thats not really low-light as theres clearly a strong light souce, the strong processing shows up in the darker areas.
--
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:50:36
Edit :
Quote
??????? not really a lowlight ?????
if you shoot a picture in iso-200 IT IS LOWLIGHT. (its shot in complete darkness with a tiny 15w lamp beside it, if you wonder)
what about iso-500 (now we really testing the limit of a cellphone
i would never get this quality with my w810 at night in iso-500. thats for sure.
http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/1074/200903152131qzn837.jpg
anyway...i would rather buy c510 for a better allround camera
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 00:03:36
Edit :
Quote
W902 was shit in low-ligt, is my experience. W810 was much better. But for overall cam performance and usability, go for C510.
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 00:13:56
Edit :
Quote
My c510 is great outdoors and pathetic indoors unless its fairly close up shots with the flash its fine. I remember having a w810 and the 'flash' was actually better in the dark than the c510 one. But overall the c510 is better more advanced and clearer picture.
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 03:59:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
