General discussions : Other manufacturers : New Nokia 6303 with 17 days battery life
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> New Nokia 6303 with 17 days battery life
Bookmark topic
Nokia has finally released the successor of its popular 6300. The new 6303 now features a 3.2 mega pixel camera with auto focus and LED flash. Also features VGA video @ 15 fps. Much improvement over its older model the 6300. Its design features again the same stainless steel frame with basic but stylish design with a slightly bigger 2.2 inch screen. Although the only let down is it still only features EDGE technology with no 3G. On top of all this the phone features a bold claim by Nokia with a battery life of 17 days standby or 7 hours talk time

This is improved over the old model which had poor battery life and was the main complaint. The new battery is a larger capacity one. For more info and pics see
http://www.nokia.co.uk Price is only £125 sim free. Think its a very bold battery life claim from Nokia wonder if its that good in the real world. The Nokia 6303 is also the smaller brother of the 3G enabled 6700 which also features the classic Nokia candy bar sleek design which has proved so popular.
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2009-06-07 16:57 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-07 17:53:00
Edit :
Quote
17 days?
I would buy just for that incredible battery life.
--
Posted: 2009-06-07 22:26:06
Edit :
Quote
Saw the posters for it at the local CPW, for 100 quid (if memory serves me correctly) when bought with a T-Mobile PAYG sim; not sure which other networks were also offered with it. They were also advertising the 2 colour options, i.e. all-black or the 6300-esque black n' silver scheme.
[ This Message was edited by: amawanqa on 2009-06-07 21:59 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-07 22:57:35
Edit :
Quote
urm i hate to say it but that isnt too impressive... the 17 days isnt bad but the iphone (sorry to bring it up) claims 300 hours (12 1/2 days) or 10 hours talktime (2g) so it has a better talk time. Im guessing the nokia just has a really good way of disabling everything when not in use, good phone for emergencies when u just need it with u and not to use it much
iPhone 3G offers up to 5 hours of talk time on 3G, 10 hours of talk time on 2G,1 5 hours of Internet use on 3G2, 6 hours of Internet use on Wi-Fi,3 7 hours of video playback,4 or 24 hours of audio playback5 on a full charge at original capacity. In addition, iPhone features up to 300 hours of standby time.6
--
Posted: 2009-06-08 01:16:15
Edit :
Quote
Lol yeah but its impressive for a Nokia. I like the look and quailty of the phone I used to have the 6300 as a second phone it was very reliable but a little bland with crap battery life and dreadful camera. This looks heaps better

I thought when I first read it that cos of the long battery life it might use OLED display but it does not. It just uses a high powered battery. It uses a BL 5CT 1050 battery. The colours are silver black and brown.
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2009-06-08 01:42 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-08 02:33:00
Edit :
Quote
im not too sure about the design but if its under 150 cant complain really
--
Posted: 2009-06-08 14:07:06
Edit :
Quote
Review of this phone
www.gsmarena.com
--
Posted: 2009-06-09 17:08:00
Edit :
Quote
From £99.95 on PAYG (subject to the usual top-up), available in the 2 colour options that I mentioned; no brown version sold by CPW... yet:
http://www.carphonewarehouse.[....]-phones/NOKIA-6303/PPAY#bottom
Seems like I was observant enough when I was in CPW, as I mentioned in my previous post.

[ This Message was edited by: amawanqa on 2009-06-09 23:45 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-10 00:44:36
Edit :
Quote
Yes indeed you were

Its a nice decent phone for the price though like Sony Ericsson c510 similar in features and price but why no 3G

just has Edge silly silly Nokia. Sony Ericsson managed HSDPA in similar priced phone. There is on Nokia website a chestnut colour
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2009-06-10 01:26 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-10 02:01:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply