>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SonyEricsson or Nokia ???
Bookmark topic
We say SE is better than Nokia... alright agreed... but my question is how and why? lets see what you all have to say about the following
What features are there in SE that are not available in Nokia?
What SE features are better than that of Nokia?
Annoying things about Nokia and how they are not annoying in SE?
What features do you expect SE to incorporate in their future handsets?
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 13:56:00
Edit :
Quote
One annoying thing with the newest bunch of Nokia's is the absence of Bluetooth.
Why on earth did they not include BT in 6610 for instance? It's clearly a business-style phone, but without BT the organization I work for would never consider buying it.
My guess is that most new SE phones that will be launched this spring will have BT.
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 14:32:00
Edit :
Quote
Absolute shite topic discussing this further is a waste of time !
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 14:37:00
Edit :
Quote
I'll tell you why everyone here says SE is better, cuz this is an SE forum, why would you come here if you are a nokia fan, right? Well I first came here when I bought my t68i, but now I sold it (at a profit, thats only why I sold it) because I wanted more colors on the screen, java, and polyphonic ringtones. However, when I started looking into the p800 and the 3650 I will admit the 3650 looks bad, but when I saw the prices and minimal feature differences, I completely scrapped the p800 from my mind. I can get used to the 3650's look and nokia in general has very high resale value compared to SE due to Sony's Made in Malaysia thing, some people don't care but obviously I would presonally prefer a high quality device made in Finland over in Malaysia, before that, SE used to make them in Sweden which was respectable (not all of them are made in malaysia now but my t68i was). Also Nokia is more respectable when it comes to phone experience, Ericsson has an OK background, but uncomparable to that of Nokia, also Sony coming into things, they don't improve that reputation (except I will admit SonyStyle looks on the phones now make good looking headsets). Also, for those that complain about bluetooth, here in the US at least, bluetooth is barely ever used, including in most countries besides maybe European countries. If Nokia released a full featured phone (including bluetooth), why would you buy the next phone when it came out? It's a marketing ploy (that I personally don't respect) done by many companies, including SE, when the T68i came out, they could of easily included java and poly rings (in the I not the regular M), however they deliberatly chose not to due to also the same type of marketing ploy. Now I still like SE and only in my next phone I am going over to Nokia, but still, the mass production when Sony took over just leads to crappy headsets and in many countries the only reason SE isn't popular is because they easily break (one drop of my t68i and it got scratched up, I dropped dozens of phones before and they just don't simply get scratched up).
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 17:36:00
Edit :
Quote
God, i've heard alot of bollocks before, but that last post takes the biscuit! Nokia phones are total shite end of story. Right, next question?!
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 17:42:00
Edit :
Quote
Please!! 3650 is a brick with a crap keypad.. why the hell did u buy one- BT is the best thing to happen to us, as you say especially in europe. I am sticking with
not those bricks that nok*a bring out. I mean sure their
old mono-screen phones like the 3310 and 6510 were cool when they came out (hell i had both), but now that more advanced technology is entering the marketplace,
is the way to go with their superior engineering and design.
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 17:48:00
Edit :
Quote
Well said that man! Nokia are mad, bluetooth is amazing, it should be on all new mobiles as far as i'm concerned!
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 17:57:00
Edit :
Quote
I think the cracks are beginning to show as far as N*kia are concerned - The 7210 was recalled first by O2, then T-Mobile, because of problems with the MMS function. I don't remember something like this happening before. Also, the 3210/3310/3330/3410/3510 series look cheap and the build quality isn't as good as it used to be, apparently. Maybe N*kia have become complacent over the last few years. For me, it's definitely
even though I used to dislike anything that was connected with Sony. However, I've had my mind changed by owning a T68 and the eventual replacement will definitely be another
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 18:21:00
Edit :
Quote
This topic has been discussed ovr a dozen times. But just a thought, are products made in finland superior to those made in malaysia? What the hell is SE's quality control group for then? Arent specs uniform regardless where the products were assembled? Also, in my country, SE phones command higher re-sale value than nokia.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 18:30:00
Edit :
Quote
fadywwf316-->>> SE still manufacture phones in sweden
--
Posted: 2003-01-28 18:33:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
