>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> hugh camera test with Satio on top
Bookmark topic
Satio won in the end because it have better/easier camera-features & functions. though, i think Pixon and N86 photo quality is very good............that candy photo by Satio is splendid
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia x10
Satio
Nokia N86
Samsung pixon 12
HTC desire
LG crystal
Nokia N900
Iphone 3GS
scores and verdicts
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2011-01-06 20:51 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-06 21:35:08
Edit :
Quote
The top camera phones one year ago... I don't see a link to the test. Was it done recently?
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 00:13:54
Edit :
Quote
Pixon 12 is clearly the best, washed out results from the Satio, too much NR.
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 00:30:59
Edit :
Quote
You forgot the BEST one: C905!
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 05:41:22
Edit :
Quote
Pixon have probably the "best" image quality, i agree on that,....but (like i said) Satio won because it have better/easier features/function.
though, i would not buy a Pixon......Samsung´s interface and UI is just crappy and un-realstic.
ps...that second Pixon picture is really bad (over-bright, and so on).........so even Pixon has it backsides......
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2011-01-07 12:42 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 13:37:37
Edit :
Quote
I wouldn't buy a Pixon either, neither would I buy a Satio, if you want good photos and video dont buy a phone just because it's got a good camera on it, buy a high end compact or a DSLR depending on how you take photos.
@skyline
SE did a very good job at marketing the C905's camera, they constantly compared it to the image quality of compacts and they even went as far as to lie about the megapixel count and write 8.1 MP on the face of the camera, when in reality the pixel count was 7.9. It was all marketing, much like Apple does with every single product they release , even if it doesn't deserve all the hyp. The same goes for the C905, marketing it so well paid off for SE, the discussion thread is 350+ pages long, everyone wanted a phone with a high quality camera on.
The truth of the C905 camera is that it's not that good... Noise reduction ruins any detail, I posted a comparison between C901 and C905, 5 MP vs 8 MP and the C901 won hands down in terms of detail even though it had a lower resolution... marketing can be very powerfu.
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 14:56:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
