>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Samsung
> Nokia 808 Pureview Vs Dslr's
Bookmark topic
That Is To Kill Any Samsung Fan And Sony Fan Of Anger And Envy !
Done In A Comparison Between The Nokia 808 PureView VS Canon EOS 5D Mark III, Nikon D800, Sony Alpha 77 And Sony Alpha 85, Or Be A Cameraphone Against Digital Cameras Professional !
The Result Was...
NOKIA 808 PUREVIEW Exceeded 2 Sony Alpha Digital Cameras And Became a Little Below The Competitors Canon And Nikon! !!!
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha !
P.S: Nokia 808 PureView (__Abyss__) All The Other Planet Mobile With Integrated Digital Camera ![ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2013-01-15 00:31 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 04:00:38
Edit :
Quote
With 808 PureView, Nokia
Destroyed The Market For Compact Digital Cameras !!!
P.S: Sony Fans Admit... The Japanese Giant Is Very From Behind Finns When The Subject Is Photo Quality !!!
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 04:07:48
Edit :
Quote
AFAIK, the lens used by Nikon are made by Sony which means Sony has a part in the Nikon D800. Sony makes the best in its class camera sensor but they fall short in the software part nevertheless this is indeed a feat for Nokia. This is actually a good move by Nokia which will eventually force other manufacturers like Sony to step up the game with more advanced optics.
I am just worried that they're having a hard time releasing it globally. I also wonder if this cameraphone monster is enough to save Nokia from its sinking ship..
[ This Message was edited by: Shino03 on 2012-06-18 04:04 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 05:03:08
Edit :
Quote
Shino03...
That I Believe Is
808 PureView A Framework That Will Get Over It Starts To Nokia !
That Strengthens Me And This is What Assurance Here In My Country (Brazil), There Is a Waiting
List Of Over 800 Thousand Interested In Acquisition Of This Smartphone, Which Is The One And Done To Both A Symbian Smartphone !
In
February 2013 With The Arrival Of
Technology PureView In Windows Phone Smartphones, Without Any Doubt Nokia Will Return To Lead In Sales, Is The Best Solution For Multimedia And Corporate !!!
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 07:13:00
Edit :
Quote
808 beating a full frame DSLR A850?
Keep dreaming dude,
at ISO 100-400 808 Pureview at 8mp could probably outperform most digital cameras with 1/1.8" and below, but anything higher than that and 808 starts suffering, literally. FYI ISO 1600 is the strength of all APS-C/Micro 4/3/ cameras/ ILC/ DSLRs and even the new Sony Cybershot RX100, and yes that person didn't even used the full strength of both 5D and A850. and of course to add insult to the pain try looking at Mobile-Review's night shots done at full 38mp resolution using Nokia 808
Here's a 100% crop of 808's nightshot at full 38MP effective resolution
more from this review
http://mobile-review.com/review/nokia-808-en.shtml
PS: Just wake me up if Nokia 808's 38MP mode could produce night shots as clean as this
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA900/FULLRES/YDSC00063.HTM[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2012-06-18 08:00 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 08:17:41
Edit :
Quote
Rasec...
First... Learn To Read And Find And Post Feedback !!!
His Comparative Has No Credibility Some !
Since That Night Photo 808 PureView Captured By The Used On You Did Not Have An Example Of
Assistance A Tripod, Was Not Used In The Camera Configuration Adequate And Above She Was Not Captured Mode PureView !!!
Have a Sony Camera Cited By You Had The Aid Of a Tripod And Settings Suitable For The Camera This Type Of Scene And Brightness !
P.S: Got the Nokia Admit That Got No Other (
Including Your Beloved Sony), Or Be, "Exterminate" The Digital Camera Market Compact And
Cause Some Excitement In Market DSLRs !!!
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 09:01:09
Edit :
Quote
Even As A Smartphone Only !!! 
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 09:04:22
Edit :
Quote
I don't know why but I felt trolled upon reading your posts
my point was pretty clear that 808 at Full Res sucked at lowlight but instead of objectively answering me you bashed Eldar for being anti-nokia. the pictures speak for themselves. Your point was that A850 doesn't hold a candle against 808 pureview by which you laughed hard but after seeing the samples given to us by Eldar you accused him for not using Tripod?
and accused the reviewer of DSLR A850 the Imaging-resource.com a proper camera review website for using Tripod on A850 when in fact it didn't? With all due respect do you actually understand photography? if you do, please explain to me why the A850 sample I provided above was shot using ISO800 and still looked good when the 808 @38MP just miserably failed?
and PS: sort your sentence construction and the way you spelled my name next time okay? I just can't fathom a single sentence from your post.
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2012-06-18 08:25 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 09:24:18
Edit :
Quote
In my opinion, this is
pixel peeping at its worst.
First - These samples are not straight from the camera. These cameras have different sensor resolutions, and as we can see, the crops are identical which means that some of the images has been post-processed after the capture. We do not know what's been done, but most likely it has been some kind of image sharpening to some of them during the resizing.
Second - Image quality is of course not everything when we talk about cameras. There is more to a camera than capturing a sharp close-up image in a studio. The same way you don't only talk about display resolution alone when reviewing a mobile phone. Things I like about DLSR are faster focus speed, no shutter delay, better ergonomics including dedicated keys for camera adjustments, optical viewfinder and of course exchangeable lenses.
If you believe capturing photos with the PureView 808 is similar DSLR, then go ahead and use it as your main camera. Just don't tell everyone else that you have no experience with a DSLR and what they are capable of. There is no doubt that the 808 is a very good camera phone, but it is not comparable to any DSLR. Inserting a Bugatti engine inside a Ford Focus does not make it a supercar.
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 12:14:55
Edit :
Quote
Laffen...
Respect Your Opinion !!!
However, The Question Is Not 808 PureView That Will Not Replace Or DSLRs !
The Real Question Is Nokia Got A Mark In History Of Cell Phones, Or Be, With Just One Smartphone She Just Ended Up With The Digital Camera Market Dedicated (For Nothing Can Match The Photo Quality Top Of The Line Of Nokia) And Intimidate Caused in DSLR Market, After a
Single Cell Phone Gotta Photo Quality Equivalent And Some Moments Exceeding Professional Cameras DSLR (Sony Alpha) !
Something I Never Thought Until Then!
A Done That Sony And Samsung Manufacturers (Who Also Develop Phones Digital Cameras) Never Managed To Idealize Not Even !
On The Importance Of Testing That And Their Corresponding Results !!!
What Ratified Even More Awards Received For Nokia Through The Tipa, Eisa And GSMA !
P.S: Here I Close My Participation In This Topic, For Every Time I'm Through Being Harassed Speculations Cheap, As Always Here What Worked With The Truth Of The Facts !
It's Only A Question On Air... What Was The Sony Ericsson ???... What Was The Sony Mobile ???...
What Was The Samsung Mobile ??? In That Managed To Overcome Photo Quality All Digital Compact Cameras And Dedicated To Compete Equal Terms With DSLR Cameras ???
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 23:04:52
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
