>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Motorola
> Motorola RAZR i Discussion
Bookmark topic
Motorola XT890 RAZR i Key Features:
- 3G Network: HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
- Connectivity: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Dual Band, DLNA, Wi - Fi HotSpot, Bluetooth v2.1 With A2DP, EDR, MicroUSB v2.0 And NFC With Android Beam
- Dimensions 122.5 x 60.9 x 8.3 mm
- Weight 126 Grams.
- Display 4.3" Super Amoled Advanced (~256 Ppi Pixel Density) With Corning Gorilla Glass
- 8 GigaBytes Memory Internal (5,25 Gigabytes Available For User)
- Card Slot (32 GigaBytes)
- 1 GigaByte Ram (970 MegaBytes After The System Boot)
- CPU Intel Atom Medfield Z2460 x86 2 GHz (SemiConductor Technology 32 nm High - K/Metal Gate)
- GPU PowerVR SGX540 (Single Core Graphics @400 MHz)
- Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) Upgradable To 4.1.2 (Jelly Bean)
- Office Document Editor (Word, Excel, PowerPoint And Reader PDF)
-
8 MP With Flash Led
-
CamCorder FullHD 1080p @30 FPS (Stereo Sound Rec)
- VGA Front Chat Camera And CamCorder VGA @15 FPS (Stereo Sound Rec)
- Active Noise Cancellation With Dedicated Mic
- Standard Battery Li-Ion 2000 mAh
- Kevlar Coated And Splash Resistant Body
- Available In Black And White Colors
Technichal Specifications Photographic Razr i:
* Lens:
4 Elements Plastic
* F-Number:
f/2.65
* Focal Length:
4.03mm
* Focus Range:
8 Cm - Infinity
* Iso Sensitivity:
100 - 1505
* Shutter Speed:
Min - (1/2s) / Max - (1/10000s)
* Features Digital Camera:
Digital Image Stabilization, Touch - Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Geo - Tagging And Dedicated Shutter Key
* Sensor:
CMOS BSI OMNIVISION OV8820
* Format:
1/3.2”
* Surface:
(5.68 mm x 4.54 mm)
* Flash:
Led (2rd Generation)
* Pixel Size:
1.4 Microns
* Maximum Effective Pixels Resolution:
3264 x 2448 For 4:3 / 3264 x 1840 For 16:9
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2013-01-20 05:50 ]
--
Posted: 2012-09-18 17:07:13
Edit :
Quote
According to the benchmarks, the 2Ghz CPU is not really outshining the likes of a dual core Qualcomm S4 and/or quad A9 tegra3, and the SGX540 GPU is ancient to say at least, Intel should've build a lowerpower version of their HD graphics found on Sandy/ivy bridge CPUs instead. and there's the issue of android apps using native ARM codes which has to be emulated by the X86 architecture, which could lead to performance penalty.
If that thing went with dual core ~5W AMD G-series APU (with a superior low power DX11 HD7xxx gpu) instead it could blow the competition away in terms of graphics performance while consuming almost similar power as this atom chip used on this.
--
Posted: 2012-09-18 17:28:30
Edit :
Quote
Yes I read that too. Why is Moto sticking with qHD displays?? :-/ Haven't tried anything from Motorola since the Defy which was an ok phone
--
Posted: 2012-09-19 23:27:00
Edit :
Quote
This Week, I'm Taking The Opportunity To Do Some
Testing With
Motorla Razr i And I Confess That I Am
Pleasantly Surprised With This Smartphone !
The
Same Is Compact,
Lightweight And
Has An Excellent Build !
On The Resources Side, I Am Pleasantly Surprised With The
Excellent Quality Of The Music Player, Audio Quality Is Above Average And Offers a
Consistent Experience !
But What Really Should Be Highlighted In This Unit Is
The Excellent Camcorder And The
Wonderful Web Browsing, Fluency And Speed In Various Sites Is Worthy To Match The More Advanced Models Such As (
GALAXY S III), What Is Truly Something Amazing !
On The More
Negative Aspects Are Due To
The Mediocre Autonomy Of Battery And
Archaic/Weak GPU !
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-25 19:37 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-25 00:59:16
Edit :
Quote
Below Some Synthetic Benchmarks !
QUADRANT
ANTUTU
GEEKBENCH 2
VELLAMO
BENCHMARK PI
LINPACK (RUN MULTI – THREAD MODE)
NENAMARK 2
GPU BENCH
GPU MARK
BROWSERMARK 2.0
SUNSPIDER 0.91
RIABENCH FOCUS TESTS
MOZILLA KRAKEN BENCHMARK
GOOGLE OCTANE
HTML 5
GLBENCHMARK 2.5 EGYPT HD (ONCREEN)
GLBENCHMARK 2.5 EGYPT HD (1080p OFFSCREEN)
BASEMARK ES 2.0
MULTITOUCH TESTER
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2013-01-14 02:43 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-25 01:05:48
Edit :
Quote
Today I Took The Day To Visit My Grandparents, That For More Than Two Months Did Not See !
As My 808 PureView PRO Was Out Of Battery, I Decided To Make My Walk With The
Galaxy S III And My New
Razr i, Savvy So I Decided To Make a
Comparison Between These Two Smartphones, Testing The Performance Of Both In One
Night Shot With
Bad Lighting Condition !
The 2 Devices Were Supported To Stop The Balcony And Configured To Trigger On
Night Mode, Note Just Below The Result Of Both !!!
GALAXY S III (
Exposure Time 1/2s And Iso 640)
RAZR i (
Exposure Time 1/2s And Iso 800)
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-26 03:02 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-25 23:45:41
Edit :
Quote
Particularly I Prefer Result Provided By
S III !!!
For Despite The Darker Image, Same Account With Less Noise !
However the New Smartphone From Motorola Has A Result Expressive, Featuring Increased
Brightness !
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-26 02:51 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-25 23:52:49
Edit :
Quote
Some Interesting Reviews Of Razr i !
ZTOP:
http://ztop.com.br/motorola-razr-i-xt890-review/
GSMARENA:
http://www.gsmarena.com/motorola_razr_i_xt890-review-828.php
MOBILEWITCH:
http://www.mobilewitch.com/Mo[....]Android_review_details_122.htm
PHONEARENA:
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Motorola-RAZR-i-Review_id3151
TUDOCELULAR:
http://www.tudocelular.com/Mo[....]ovas/n1626/Motorola-RAZRi.html
--
Posted: 2012-11-26 04:20:44
Edit :
Quote
Sample Images Camera: Example Mode Landscape !!!
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-28 01:26 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-28 02:25:47
Edit :
Quote
Sample Images Camera: Example Mode Macro !!!
--
Posted: 2012-11-28 02:31:58
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
