News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Which SE phones ( to date ) has the best antennae reception quality? Bookmark topic

Hi to everyone!

I am just curious know which among the SE phones in the market today has the best antennae signal? Thanks.

[ This Message was edited by: cdcjr on 2003-02-26 03:30 ]

[ This Message was edited by: cdcjr on 2003-02-26 03:32 ]

[ This Message was edited by: cdcjr on 2003-02-26 17:01 ]
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 04:29:00
Edit : Quote


T39, T39m, or T39mc

the worst is probably the T68i
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 04:40:00
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2003-02-26 04:40, Ah_long wrote:
T39, T39m, or T39mc

the worst is probably the T68i



Nope, R520 is better than T39 in this regard... I would even say that the T39 performs rather poorly in this aspect...
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 16:33:00
Edit : Quote


I don't find the reception of the T68 worse or better than T39 or the Nokia phones I've tried.

I guess most reception complaints are from the US people when using the 1900Mhz band. In the 900 (which is the "normal" GSM) band I find no problems with reception at all.
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 17:12:00
Edit : Quote


-preface: this is going to be an intentionally cruel statement-

NORMAL huh? well, at least you have decided to join a discussion that uses a "normal" language, not like Swedish or anything.

-the point is every country has their own characteristics, none is better than any other
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 17:15:00
Edit : Quote


@ shawnmccall9

This was in no way intented as an insult or anything like that. And if you took it like an insult I'm sorry.

Most of the countries in the world does use 900Mhz for GSM (1800Mhz for the extra band). That is why I called it the "normal" GSM band. So far I only now of U.S/Canada that uses the 1900Mhz band. (The higher frequency does have an impact on the coverage though).

My point was, that the T68 seems to have worse reception on the 1900Mhz band compared to other phones. But on the 900/1800Mhz band it seems to be on par with most other phones.

[ This Message was edited by: ppcrockar on 2003-02-26 16:57 ]
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 17:56:00
Edit : Quote


How about the antenna reception of SE p800 as against the T39?
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 18:07:00
Edit : Quote


P800 rf is better than t39.I made the comparison using both units in a low coverage spot.On the other hand i have to say that T39 with the special IAT10 antenna is quite impressive.
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 22:36:00
Edit : Quote


The good old T28 had a great reception!
T39 has also very good reception (used in 1800MHz).
The T600 has a really poor reception (used in 900MHz), which is expected in that size.
--
Posted: 2003-02-26 23:44:00
Edit : Quote


T68i has lousy reception!
--
Posted: 2003-02-27 09:20:00
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index