>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Garbage threads
> Quantum Mechanics V Relativity
Bookmark topic
If you had not seen this thread, would it not have existed.
--
Posted: 2003-03-14 04:19:00
Edit :
Quote
depends on the relative quotient of the 4-foot left-handed monkeys compared to the serrated cucumber logarithm
--
Posted: 2003-03-14 09:29:00
Edit :
Quote
in commemoration of the late great albert einstein let this thread flourish for today is his birthday....
--
Posted: 2003-03-14 09:39:00
Edit :
Quote
in relativity to ur knowledge, it wld not hv existed
in relativity to existence, it does...
and btw, that isnt quantum physics...
--
Posted: 2003-03-14 23:11:00
Edit :
Quote
The "V" is for VERSUS. IE; Alberts struggle to declare an explainable system of order & action on reaction.
--
Posted: 2003-03-15 01:28:00
Edit :
Quote
versus is usually "vs"
maybe not where u come from
--
Posted: 2003-03-15 04:07:00
Edit :
Quote
But does "where i come from" only exist when i'm there & if not can it be prooved.
--
Posted: 2003-03-15 14:47:00
Edit :
Quote
it exists, all matter exists even if unknown..
but it's state is unknown..
it's like if u put a cat in a box with a poison in there
u dont know when it died or if the cat it died.. the cat is then speculated as being nor alive nor dead...
but u know the cat is there..
same goes for "where u come from"
--
Posted: 2003-03-15 22:19:00
Edit :
Quote
The point of the experiments was to prove the existance of the cat when the box is shut, you can't just assume it's in there because it was there when the box was open, the whole point of science is you need to PROVE it's there.
The cat could just become physical matter at the monent you open the lid.
Assumption has no place in science. i agree it's highly unlikely that it isn't in the box when you can't see it, but i don't think even Albert could prove the existance of things that are in the universe any further than the fact that we choose to except that what we see is what we beleive to be in existance & therefor is physical matter.
Have you ever seen been decieved by your own eyes, if you have & many people have, then surely what you think we saw must actualy exist, but it may have only existed in your brain, not anyone elses, so this could apply to other things like the cat in the box !
--
Posted: 2003-03-15 23:10:00
Edit :
Quote
You are absolutely right, Pachy, existence cannot be proven. Like the old, "if a tree falls in the forest, does it make any noice if nobody is around to hear it fall?". Or Platon's cave theory etc..
This is all very scary and interesting when you really start thinking about it. Like the plot of Matrix...
And about the separation of dream vs reality. You all know how realistic a dream can be, then what about if your whole existance is based on another persons dream? What about an existing parallel universe where it's inhabitants sleeps 2/3 of each day keeping you awake, determening your faith, and vice versa. And if you then go 24 hours without sleeping, some other person in the parallel universe will simply not exist at all that day. That probably would be for the better since my dreams are pretty wierd, but that person(s) in the parallel universe that dreams my existence must have really boring dreams...
How do I know my friend exist right now, I am not with my friend now, so I have no solid proof that he exists at this very moment.
Think I'll go to sleep now, keeping some poor soul in the other universe alive for a few hours, perhaps he'll even get lucky..
--
Posted: 2003-03-16 02:17:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
