>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> se T610 or nokia 6100?
Bookmark topic
i need a new phone,what whould you guys recommend?
Is it worth to get T610 over 6100 if you don't use bluetooth,don't need a 65k colour screen and hate the T610's design?(it's just a T300 with 65k colours built in cam and bleutooth)
6100 is smaller nicer feel and very good looks
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 16:51:00
Edit :
Quote
Well it looks like you know what u want, so whats the point of asking?
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 16:59:00
Edit :
Quote
i think you have answered your own question.if you dontneed the camera feature not bothered about a 65k display or bluetooth.get the nokia.
however you may have a need for them in the future.
sometimes its better to have the extra things in case you need them
its your money at the end of the day though
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 17:01:00
Edit :
Quote
Diz topic sucks-oops just kidin! Maybe u should get this thread ended -jokelng go for the nokia 6100 if it suots ur nose este sooths urs!
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 17:09:00
Edit :
Quote
I prefer the t610 because its a very much more exiting phone. But if you dont like the design. . .
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 17:10:00
Edit :
Quote
It's of course up to you. But the T610 beats the crap out of the Nokia 6100.
The T610 has a better display (more colours and higher resultion), camera, bluetooth, more polyphonic channels for the ringtones, picture caller ID, both Java & Mophun (The Mophun games are much better than Java games), more memory in the phone, user-editable themes (AFAIK Nokia can still not change the colours the way they want to in the display), much better menu sytem. This is afew reason why T610 is better IMHO.
Another thing. Why would you want to change your T300 to a 6100. The T300 is a better phone IMHO. Ok, the Nokia screen is a little better (but if you don't need more colours this doesn't matter right), but that is all. The T300 is just as good or better on everthng compared to teh 6100.
[ This Message was edited by: ppcrockar on 2003-03-21 16:48 ]
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 17:41:00
Edit :
Quote
T610 over 6100??? Mismatch!!! Your question shud be.... T68i or 6100? il stil choose t68i though! So wat if 6100 has more colors, it doesnt matter! So wat if 6100 has polytunes, in a world of noise, u nid 2 have a loud ringtone!
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 17:51:00
Edit :
Quote
ok! sorry i asked
T300 is just too ugly for me,so is T610
but i like the features of T300 and T610
that's why i'am having some trouble choosing,you see?
4056 colours to 256 colours is a lot of difference
but 4056 to 65k is not that much different(for such a small screen it isn't) that's what i think
bluetooth has no meaning for me,nor will it in the future
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 18:24:00
Edit :
Quote
I tried the 6100 the other day, its my friends. He had it for 1 week only and already it had dust under the screen. Also the feel of the phone wasn't worthy the price of it (about 500 )
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 18:29:00
Edit :
Quote
if the T68i had 4056 colours it would be the perfect phone for me
i'ts the only se phone that i've had in my hands that is well built,looks nice and feels nice in your hand
--
Posted: 2003-03-21 18:30:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
