Sony Ericsson / Sony : Tips and tricks : Samsung SPHi500 overtakes SE T610 as top model...
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Tips and tricks
> Samsung SPHi500 overtakes SE T610 as top model...
Bookmark topic
... however T610 is still among the top 5 sexiest phones in the market.

)
http://reviews.cnet.com/Cell_phones/4521-6525_7-5021435.html?tag=cal
--
Posted: 2003-09-17 09:25:13
Edit :
Quote
Well.. the Samsung SPH-i500 is so ugly that it makes me throw up even in the dark when i can't see it..
SE T610, is still the best.. Sexy as hell..
--
Posted: 2003-09-21 16:48:56
Edit :
Quote
A phone is about functionality 1st.Can some1 copy/paste the article here so we can read it thru wap now,pls?Then i'll have an opinion10x:-D
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2003-09-21 17:29:20
Edit :
Quote
The i500 is a smartphone ( organizer+phone); it is only fair that you compare it to SE smartphone series; P800 and the coming P810(P900?).
And you know no samsung regular phones come close to the T610 in form & function!!!!
--
Posted: 2003-09-21 18:36:27
Edit :
Quote
701... there is a chart in the article that I cannot copy and paste anyway for all you wappies out there. sorry
erm.... there are other phones and smart phones (including P800) in the comparison.... the issue is the best combo of features and design on phones....... (including smart phones)
Muyst say i quite fancy the Samsung I500 myself
--
Posted: 2003-09-22 11:27:28
Edit :
Quote
After my last experience with a Samsung A300 id never touch 1 again lo
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2003-09-22 11:32:15
Edit :
Quote
@Vlam:damn,girl,skip the darn charts and copy the article;-) still no time 4me today to get to a netcafe:-(
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2003-09-22 12:59:34
Edit :
Quote
there IS no article

just a chart. It's not really THAT exciting
--
Posted: 2003-09-22 13:17:47
Edit :
Quote
Its now been pushed to 3rd by the lg vx6000 - which id never seen before - it looks damn fine!
--
Posted: 2003-09-23 20:49:02
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply