>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> Java P800 faster than P900 ?
Bookmark topic
found on
http://www.jbenchmark.com/
it seems that the P800 is still better than the P900.
Have anyone tested this jbenchmark stuff on their new P900 ?
thanks for any feedback, seems weird with the new CPU...
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 15:01:40
Edit :
Quote
Hi all
this is a short detailed comparison of benchmark results...
P800 P900
text 699 509
2d 553 490
3d 318 349
fill rate 116 288
animation 704 520
----------------------------------------------------
2390 2096
Conclusion:
While P800 tops in Text, 2D and animation, P900 is a little step faster
in 3D (about 4FPS) and beats P800 FillRate in over 200% -
what does that mean ???
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 17:22:55
Edit :
Quote
that means p900 is better
p.s : I think those benchmarks sometimes dont show the real world performance... You have to test it with an app. that features both text & 2D or 3D...
This benchmark says that 7650 is better that N-gage in 3D java... but that doesn't mean that 7650 is faster than N-gage in 3D apps. It's only a Java benchmark.
_________________
http://www.jungiesoftware.tk -
Phones SE t310 , p800 and Nokia N-Gage...
[ This Message was edited by: jungie on 2003-11-01 16:35 ]
[ This Message was edited by: jungie on 2003-11-01 16:38 ]
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 17:32:07
Edit :
Quote
Maybe it isn't better in midp 1.0 but it's better in midp 2.0; why? because p800 doesn't have it,
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 17:54:00
Edit :
Quote
i think the P900 will be faster than the P900. the software is really fast...
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 20:01:02
Edit :
Quote
@ Sonyericsson-man, how can the P900 be faster than its self?
--
Posted: 2003-11-01 20:16:37
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
