>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> p900 vs nokia 6600 rf
Bookmark topic
Hello to everyone,
Who has the best antennae rf ? p900 or Nokia 6600 RF? Pls. give an objective opinion. Thanks
--
Posted: 2003-11-24 23:32:11
Edit :
Quote
the nokia 6600 has far better reception than the P900. Nokias always do, that is the only weakness with SE.
And my home is in a weak signal area too, so i have to leave my phone in a certain place in my house when i am in to be able to get reception.
Having said that i have sent my 6600 back for return and am keeping the P900
--
Posted: 2003-11-25 12:36:23
Edit :
Quote
@mutleyboy
What made you decide to keep the p900 instead of the Nokia 6600?
--
Posted: 2003-11-25 22:41:57
Edit :
Quote
Good taste, of course.
--
Posted: 2003-11-25 22:52:38
Edit :
Quote
just find it more to my liking.
I like the touchscreen and the size of the screen.
Stereo music playback, Sman app so have the ability to auto bluejack people.
6600 is a great phone too, just found it not as good overall as the p900. Its advantages are: smaller size, better RF, cheaper memory
--
Posted: 2003-11-25 22:52:42
Edit :
Quote
@Mutleyboy
Autobluejack other people? What do you mean?
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 00:27:37
Edit :
Quote
You can set Sman to search for BT devices on a set time delay.
When it finds a device it BlueJacks it automatically.
Means you can be very conspicuous...
BTW, i have the P800 but reception is only a problem for me when 2 different transmitters are competing.
The rest of the time (99.9%), i have the full 5 green bars.
And thats on Vodafone!
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 00:45:24
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-11-25 22:41:57, cdcjr wrote:
@mutleyboy
What made you decide to keep the p900 instead of the Nokia 6600?
N6600 does not level up with P900. P900 has more capabilities than N6600.
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 02:14:03
Edit :
Quote
What feature differences are there between the 6600 and the p900?
We know it has a bigger screen- what else feature wise?
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 03:22:06
Edit :
Quote
Theres no touch screen is there?.... which would make data entry into it's to-do list and calendar a little more time consuming (perhaps since this is Nokia's afterthought, or an included, although unrealised, extra of the Symbian OS)... and then you can't really make notes on the go in handwriting either... you sort of lose your flow with the keypad even if it has T9, which I haven't seen on it's feature list either (although i must surely have it)
And ironically, the official nokia features page for the thing doesn't specifically mention (c)WAP (which it must have, but not a great crime if it didn't really)
It also looks like other phones... vaguely similar to the Siemens SX1 for example, although surprisingly for Nokia as of late, the Siemens has won the battle and included a more radical button array! (fancy being outdone on this... wait 'til they make a successor, that'll show Siemens I bet)
But the Nokia, in spite of this does have a 2 times digital zoom... how worthwhile that is depends on how much you rate it... especially since digital zooms are so bloody pointless IMO, and the screen is too small (so too is the camera resolution) so why would anyone even attempt to manipulate the pictures it takes (not a criticism of the nokia, but of ALL camera phones together, in one steaming pile)... unless you can get one of those screen magnifyers, like the gameboys have, to alter the finer detail or sharpen the blur of the digital zoom!
I don't know what others think, but it does not look like a class, or indeed business class, phone - the market to which it is aimed if the picture in my latest Carphonewarehouses catalogue is anything to go by... I haven't seen it in real life though, so it can be excused on this one... looks a very capable device though all the same...
What are the prices for it though?
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 03:48:26
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
