>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> polymorphic hype
Bookmark topic
I hope
never will replace iMelody with polymorphic ringtones.
why? Cause iMelody sounds good enough it's a easy format to hand edit it handles fairly long tunes and you can insert effects in very cool ways so it's not just sound it also controls feel/looks (lights/vibrations)
ie. greater control cooler looks.
If
ever gonna add support for polymorphic ringsignals I do hope they gonna keep the support for iMelody's also.
Only thing I wish regarding sound is that they add support to choose your own iMelody for SMS allerts.
_________________
T68i (R2A014) ::
http://wap.lixom.nu
[ This Message was edited by: dw on 2002-06-05 10:25 ]
[ This Message was edited by: dw on 2002-06-05 10:26 ]
--
Posted: 2002-06-05 11:25:00
Edit :
Quote
polyPHONIC not polymorphic...
It plays many tunes at the same time, but does not have many shapes at the same time
By the way I don't agree with you, polyphonic speaker will play also iMelodies, plus you will be able to get music, voices etc. As a ringtone.
The volume can be very high indeed.
I had a Panasonic once, and that is the only feature I still miss... It was really cool believe me
--
Posted: 2002-06-05 11:38:00
Edit :
Quote
Yeah my friend has a sony j5 and his ring tone is his sister yelling "answer the phone!"
--
Posted: 2002-06-05 12:28:00
Edit :
Quote
That would be cool!! To have someones voice as ring signal. :b
--
Posted: 2002-06-05 14:15:00
Edit :
Quote
The drawback with Polyphonic ringtones could be that some ringtones could be very annyoing.
--
Posted: 2002-06-05 19:29:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2002-06-05 11:38, pinolo77 wrote:
polyPHONIC not polymorphic...
It plays many tunes at the same time, but does not have many shapes at the same time
WHOOPS! <insert blush smiley here> hehe
Well hopefully if
makes a phone who can handle polyphonic they also will keep iMelody support so everyone
will be satisfied.
_________________
T68i (R2A014) ::
http://wap.lixom.nu[ This Message was edited by: dw on 2002-06-06 10:05 ]
--
Posted: 2002-06-06 11:03:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
