>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> P9x0 camera is only 0.08 MegaPixels !
Bookmark topic
P9x0 camera is only 0.08 Mega Pixels
I took some pics this weekend with my P910i, wich turned out fine
(for a phone camera):
http://www.esato.com/board/vi[....]ic=46542&start=1965#post993571
Later when analysing the pictures at home I reached the conclusion that besides the pics are 640x480, the P9x0 sensor is only 320x240 pixels of resolution.
What the SE firmware does is to take two snapshots in rapid succession and interlace the two pictures, so that the resolution seems to double.
This means the SE P9x0 has one of the WORST phone cameras in the marktet => ONLY 0.08 MegaPixels !!
[ This Message was edited by: _LAU_ on 2004-11-08 16:51 ]
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 17:48:22
Edit :
Quote
Sorry, but its a fone...
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 17:55:37
Edit :
Quote
how'd you figure that they were 2 interlaced photos?
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 17:57:44
Edit :
Quote
If I want to take a picture, then I use my DSC-P73 camera, rather than my P910
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 17:58:37
Edit :
Quote
I'm not saying that it's not a phone...
But they are advertizing a 0.3 MP VGA Camera, and that's a HUGE lie !!
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 17:59:46
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-11-08 17:48:22, _LAU_ wrote:
P9x0 camera is only 0.08 Mega Pixels
I took some pics this weekend with my P910i, wich turned out fine
(for a phone camera):
http://www.esato.com/board/vi[....]ic=46542&start=1965#post993571
Later when analysing the pictures at home I reached the conclusion that besides the pics are 640x480, the P9x0 sensor is only 320x240 pixels of resolution.
What the SE firmware does is to take two snapshots in rapid succession and interlace the two pictures, so that the resolution seems to double.
This means the SE P9x0 has one of the WORST phone cameras in the marktet => ONLY 0.08 MegaPixels !!
[ This Message was edited by: _LAU_ on 2004-11-08 16:51 ]
Is that true then?
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 18:01:46
Edit :
Quote
Sorry but I have more reason to believe SE saying it is VGA than you that seem to have just DECIDED otherwise!!!
Unless u can convince me otherwise with HARD EVIDENCE!!
(& remember bein a Forensic Science student I'm keen on evidence
)
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 18:03:00
Edit :
Quote
@placson
Take one picture in good light (outside) and shake the camera a bit while taking the photo. Use the maximum quality jpeg.
Go the to PC and see the image at 200% zoom.
Now take a good look at the edges of the objects. They are dented!Horizontally and vertically.
This means two images were taken. The images were interlaced to double the final image size.
Even lines are image 1, odd lines are image two. The same happens horizontaly.
Unless someone proves I'm wrong, I rest my case.
[ This Message was edited by: _LAU_ on 2004-11-08 17:07 ]
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 18:04:37
Edit :
Quote
@lau i donnow much about such tech things, but i dont think that se dare to offer a lie like this. Surely not u are the only one who make such tests, there must be an answer for it.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 18:14:05
Edit :
Quote
So you have NO proof it's not VGA!
By your reasoning it could just as likely be taking 2 VGA quality pics in order to improve quality!
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 18:14:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
