General discussions : Other manufacturers : Is Motorola catching up Nokia and SE?
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> Is Motorola catching up Nokia and SE?
Bookmark topic
Recently, moto has been aggresive on promoting their products and I must say, they are producing much better phones than nokia and to some extent SE in terms of features and design, and are certainly ahead of Samsung. I think they have the best polyphonic ring tones/mp3 tones at least. What do you guys think?
--
Posted: 2004-12-27 09:05:50
Edit :
Quote
i always thought motos looked amazing, esp. the stunning v3 my only gripe has been with the software it is totally crap!
i admit the last time i had a proper play with one was about 6 months ago (c something i think) have they improved the insides on the newer phones (v3 etc)?
--
Posted: 2004-12-27 09:15:00
Edit :
Quote
my only recent experience of Motorola is the V3 and I find the interface quite intuitive and very customisable
I find myself watching to see what Motorola are coming up with next so yes, I think they have caught my attention once again
--
Posted: 2004-12-27 09:38:47
Edit :
Quote
motorola from my point of view have made an outstanding difference with the e398 v3 and v800 so i think they are catching up very fast
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2004-12-27 10:05:02
Edit :
Quote
On paper, they are. When it comes to the real mobile phone, they're still very far behind. Sure, some have a slick design, but looks don't always reflect the performance of the phone.
Motorola phones need improvement.
--
Posted: 2004-12-27 10:09:02
Edit :
Quote
My friend recently got an imported vodaphone branded moto phone(cant remember the model
). It has a vga cam, but the quality was excellent, even when taken in the dark, unlike SE K700 which takes horrible pics in low light conditions . The display was sharp and clear, so were the ringtone quality. The only putdown was the bulky size and less memory.
And when i went to buy my k700, i asked the guys at the shop to suggest a good phone with cam and stuff and they suggested the moto. The only problem with moto is the UI imo.
_________________
Intel inside, Mental outside
[ This Message was edited by: kllr_dude on 2004-12-27 09:15 ]
--
Posted: 2004-12-27 10:13:32
Edit :
Quote
at least its not just me who dislikes motos ui. as i said in another thread yesterday, three words to motorola: ERICSSON MOBILE PLATFORMS !!!
--
Posted: 2004-12-27 11:12:00
Edit :
Quote
I still remember the day when moto launched thier 1st phone as we term it today as 'tupperware phone'. They were the so called 'big brother' in terms of mobile communication, with a 'james bond briefcase' lookalike carrying case/charger. Since then, they have lacked behind other players like nokia, samsung, siemens and se of course. But since the launched of newer models, we can see that moto is doing their part to get back what used to belong to them. I must say say that the phone they launched have caught my attention not only in terms of look(design), knowing that looks can be deceiving, but also phones that are loaded with features as well. Apart fro v3, the phones are also very competitively priced.
--
Posted: 2005-01-06 08:37:59
Edit :
Quote
I think that feature wise and construction wise moto has always been good. But i will not use a moto until they hire humans to design the ui instead of aliens. Their menues and ui are 100% counter intuitive.
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2005-01-06 08:53:01
Edit :
Quote
Thatīs what i used to think after borrowing to 1990:s Motorola phones..
Today itīs totally different! If you can manage a SE or Siemens, youīll get along just fine with Moto UI!
Oh, and SENokia: Could you please elaborate? Thatīs got to be one of the most fuzzy non factual posts i have read this week
--
Posted: 2005-01-06 09:10:59
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
