Sony Ericsson / Sony : Symbian phones : Photo Acute 2.0 finally available for PXXX
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> Photo Acute 2.0 finally available for PXXX
Bookmark topic
you can download the trial at photoacute.com.
--
Posted: 2005-02-03 04:13:56
Edit :
Quote
or my-symbian.com
--
Posted: 2005-02-03 04:25:00
Edit :
Quote
SOme have tried it (i left my dss in another city

)
worth it?
--
Posted: 2005-02-03 07:22:03
Edit :
Quote
i tried it on my p800 and i gotta say... i dont think so lol but thats my opinion either download to ur phone through wap or see what a few others say but i say its not really
--
Posted: 2005-02-03 07:35:00
Edit :
Quote
From the examples on their web my opinion it that their software do not solve the main cam phone problem - enormous .jpg compression, which probably is intended for two reasons: to save space (not an issue for cam phones with expanded memory support) and to hide artefacts caused by bad lens quality used on cam phones and to hide interlace artefacts which takes place on some cameras (also on my P900). I'd prefer compression ratio not lower than 8, but that is probably built in hardware that fine setting results in picture quality equal to compression ratio 5 or so - what is really bad actually.
--
Posted: 2005-02-03 09:25:52
Edit :
Quote
According to their web site it is currently "Tuned" for the P800 and a P900/910 version will be released soon giving better quality.
--
Posted: 2005-02-03 10:50:15
Edit :
Quote
Which is the firmware of P800 need to run PhotoAcute??
My is R1D,
--
Posted: 2005-02-03 11:18:22
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-02-03 11:18:22, manuelc wrote:
Which is the firmware of P800 need to run PhotoAcute??
My is R1D,
Taken from the PhotoAcuate website:
Note for SonyEricsson P800 users:
P800 should have firmware R2A14 or later to run PhotoAcute.
_________________
Owner of Sony Ericsson P910i, P800 and T300

[ This Message was edited by: gardar on 2005-02-03 14:13 ]
--
Posted: 2005-02-03 15:03:28
Edit :
Quote
I've used the final version, and the betas for a while now, and in most shots, you don't get much benefit in the picture, rather negative benefit. I've had one or two success stories, but in general I haven't used the prog much, simply because it takes literally 2-3 mins to process one picture.
--
Posted: 2005-02-05 07:18:45
Edit :
Quote
Would try it but crashes right after loading
But i guess it's not even worth installing anyway...
--
Posted: 2005-02-05 11:56:29
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply