Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Symbian phones : Sony Ericsson P900/910 test result comparision (from Which Cellphone! 2004 magazine)
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Symbian phones > Sony Ericsson P900/910 test result comparision (from Which Cellphone! 2004 magazine) Bookmark topic
Page12>

dhallug Posts: 305

Some of you may already subsribe to this popular mobile magazine in UK, there was an interesting comparision of the P900 and P910 and according to their tests, there was very little difference. The review was 2 page long but here are some of thier key highlights:

Performance
P900: 10/10
P910:10/10

Features
P900:10/10
P910:10/10

Call quality:
P900: 10/10
P910: 10/10

Value:
P900: 8/10
P910: 7/10

Overall:

P900: 94%
P910:94%

So, hardly any difference between the 2 except that P910 is a bit more expensive and obviously supports memory stick duo.

I was astonished to read that call quality was 10/10 considering that SE has recieved a lot of critism about it poor reception but call quality was voted the best compared with other phones like Nokia and motorola.

94% rating for both P900 nad P910 was the highest of the lot compared to other mobile phones.

--
Posted: 2005-03-02 14:23:05
Edit : Quote

PX Posts: 80

yeah youre right.. but you forget that titanium look on the P910..if looks could kill..
--
Posted: 2005-03-02 15:39:00
Edit : Quote

dhallug Posts: 305

True but I think P900 looks much better then P910

The keypad on P900 is far much superior IMO and I like its looks overall
--
Posted: 2005-03-02 17:39:18
Edit : Quote

govigov Posts: > 500

p910 has better internal memory...
--
Posted: 2005-03-02 17:52:42
Edit : Quote

dave_uk Posts: > 500

As someone who has used both (and the P800) extensively, my opinion is that the P910i is superior or equal in every respect. Obviously design is subjective, but the 910i seems to have much better build quality and looks better too IMHO. No software problems and crashing that I had with the 900!
--
Posted: 2005-03-02 18:07:43
Edit : Quote

dhallug Posts: 305

Build quality...well I think both are good but I think P900 looks a touch more solid.

I havent had any problems with the software on P900.

I think all phones will have some software problems at some point but as long as you have the latest firmware, you should be ok.

Having more internal memory doesnt make a phone better then a phone that has less internal memory.

P900 has a far superior battery performance then P910 but again it wouldnt necessarily make it a better phone.

[ This Message was edited by: dhallug on 2005-03-02 17:29 ]
--
Posted: 2005-03-02 18:28:33
Edit : Quote

dave_uk Posts: > 500

I guess looks are entirely a matter of opinion.

Same product with more internal mem is surely a better product (given that it has practical benefits, like the ability to run more great UIQ apps!)

Agreed on battery performance, though I now use alot more GPRS than I used to, and the new Bluetooth setup means it's a better connection but is bound to drain the battery more (no Auto mode).

Real plus point is Pro Duo support, and the screen for me. The QWERTY keyboard is pretty much useless to me - can't be bothered!

--
Posted: 2005-03-02 18:44:14
Edit : Quote

zynomorph Posts: 9

So if you have almost two identical phones why change it, as I do belive the qwerty key pad lets down the p910.

but in all it looks more stylish than the p900.
--
Posted: 2005-03-02 18:50:13
Edit : Quote

dhallug Posts: 305

the P910 keyboard is so so small. I cant type on those small letters. I think you need to use a sytlus to press those.

[ This Message was edited by: dhallug on 2005-03-02 21:09 ]
--
Posted: 2005-03-02 22:06:33
Edit : Quote

AMD Posts: 80

I have had P800, P900 and now I am using P910. I have to say that P910 is a bit slower in reading sms, email, mms and so on. Everytime you click on one sms the "busy" sign pops up. P900 was faster on that issue.

Do you guys agree?
--
Posted: 2005-03-02 23:04:58
Edit : Quote
Page12>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home