News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Have Sony Ericsson finally taken the lead in global mobile phone solutions? Bookmark topic

I think so.

Its K750i Nokia rival, the new 6230i, comes only with a 1.3 megapixel camera, a small screen and no flash. It does come with extras but the K750 has beaten it by far. (lets only hope the price tag isnt S700 style!)

The W800 is the first of its kind, beautiful sporty look with a solid music system that is designed as an mp3 player, not an 'add on' to a phone. Then there is the K600. A K700i, but with two cameras. Excellent. Then there's the entry level camera phone the K300 with its clean looks and excellent array of features. The J300 is designed for those wanting a touch of funkyness and contemporary/retro looks.

I think are fantastic. Their phones not only have amazing features, but also the looks and themes of the phones are unique. Nokias have the same bland colouring and features. Motorolas and samsungs are quite nice, but in the same way are either all sliding/clamshell and all silver. The phones have presented have impressed me so much.

Before March 1st i was moaning about , and now i see them as an entirely differnet company. Truly innovative.

But if their damned pricing is sky high, you can be sure to see me moaning once more!
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:09:23
Edit : Quote


The only problem that :se have is that they announce all these nice new phones with amazing specs that other manufacturers cant get near whehn they are announced, but by the time that :se have actually got them to the market the competition has caught up.
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:17:39
Edit : Quote


and when se do arrive often there are to many simple bugs that should have been sorted out before release ie phonebook bug k700
these simple bugs show a lack of testing imo.
i can accept issues with new additions/ technologys within the phone. but the basics that have been in phones since day one i find hard to accept
but apart from that yes they do seem to be trying to push mobile technology further than other manf do
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:21:41
Edit : Quote


SE lacks clamshells.
and nokia is not the main rival. samsung is.
people realize more and more that SE is better then nokia.
but some people think that samsung is the best, while they are terrible. there D500 can't make up for all those other ones, and imo the D500 is overpriced for what you get, knowing that the phone only cost 122euro to build+ship. sharing this info i'll probably receive a nice mail from samsung, but i don't care. is it so hard to give a good value for money?
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:22:14
Edit : Quote


se make real quality phones i think there cameras are so kool but they do take a while to realese and samsungetc catch up
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:24:12
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2005-03-03 20:09:23, vanquish wrote:
6230i....., a small screen .......



umm sorry but why is it small?
i mean imho k700's screen is very small and 6230i's screen is about the same size but square, and if you are talking about resolution then nokia wins with 208*208, imho 6230's screen is one of the best i saw in small phones....
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:26:16
Edit : Quote


Don't forget the v/z800
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:29:35
Edit : Quote


a good screen doesn't make up a hole phone.

i agree that nokia is good, 2nd best in my eyes, but still years behind SE. its true that nokia desirves so good words, but only when they are compaired to other brands.
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:29:40
Edit : Quote


In a recent survey conducted by a tech magazine in india, SE has in a very short time gained respect as a company in India and people have begun to look further than Nokias. This message was posted from a T230
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:34:37
Edit : Quote


also lack non touchscreen smartphones, but now everybody has to admit that is now setting the trends like withe the t68
--
Posted: 2005-03-03 20:35:29
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index