>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> Brando original or Ultra clear
Bookmark topic
Hi
Sorry to be bringing this subject up again but I'd like to know what you guys use more... I had a Martin Fields 'Glossy' protector for just under a year. The only complaint I had with it was the fact that it was very smudgy and left fingerprints.
So I'm thinking of getting an original Brando that repels fingerprints but at the price of brightness of the screen...
Do you think it's worth it, or would you rather have the fingerprint mess?
Just looking for opinions
Thanks
Jon
--
Posted: 2005-03-16 00:00:37
Edit :
Quote
well i say... finger prints can always be wiped away brightness can not come back! but really the decission is yours! xxx
--
Posted: 2005-03-16 00:34:00
Edit :
Quote
I definitely prefer the matt-type protectors. Ok, so you may lose a little bit of brightness but:
a) not very much
b) definitely prefer being able to use fingers sometimes without any visible marks
c) personally prefer the papery feel when using stylus
But it's up to you
--
Posted: 2005-03-16 10:16:28
Edit :
Quote
I use the Symmobile Anti-Scratch screen protector and it works a treat - no complaints at all
It's all down to personal pref I suppose
--
Posted: 2005-03-17 08:16:43
Edit :
Quote
I prefer brando matt over Martin Field's gross having used both of them.
--
Posted: 2005-03-17 08:50:23
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
