General discussions : General : SE K700i cam quality vs Nokia 6230 cam quality;-)
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> SE K700i cam quality vs Nokia 6230 cam quality;-)
Bookmark topic
I've seen the quality of the Nokia 6230 photos displayed on a computer with 640x480 pixels compared to my SE K700i photos displayed on a computer with the same 640x480 and quiet frankly to be unbias I have to admit that the Nokia 6230 camera quality is better. But not far better.I find that the grain on the K700i photos are very visible sometimes.What you think?
This message was posted from a K700
--
Posted: 2005-03-24 21:59:51
Edit :
Quote
My girlfriend have 6230 and k700 win in every moment on compute,only in dark 6230 is better
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2005-03-24 22:21:13
Edit :
Quote
I think this is one of the N6230's disadvantages, poor screen resolution. So, I guess the K7 wins here!
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650
--
Posted: 2005-03-25 02:35:10
Edit :
Quote
Does that N6230 have a flashlight on it?
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2005-03-25 02:45:12
Edit :
Quote
No flashlight for Nokia 6230.
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2005-03-25 05:43:36
Edit :
Quote
K700 camera quality is better imho.
This message was posted from a T230
--
Posted: 2005-03-25 05:50:44
Edit :
Quote
k700 wins hands down for day time pics agree that it has poor night mode capabilities.
--
Posted: 2005-03-25 06:53:06
Edit :
Quote
K700i has betta features all the 6230 has is changeable fascias and mmc! WoW how exciting lo btw K750i has it all and jus blows the 6230i away :-) .. The camera is alot of fun on the K700i I bearley use it myself but the pics are quite adequate ;-)
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2005-03-25 12:11:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
