News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Nokia 3250 VS. Sony Ericsson K750i(W800i) Bookmark topic

@klg what do u want, a fone or a juke-box?
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 01:28:15
Edit : Quote


Honestly, I am more after the looks of the fone and not it's specs cause I don't utilize those after all. I don't like the "Rubik's Cube" shell style of the Nokia 3250 With this, I guess I will opt for the K750i here and not even the W800i fits my taste !
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 02:28:25
Edit : Quote


mib, agree any symbian based os will have alternatives for playing just about any codec that someone bothers to write a decoder for.

This is of course the advantage of smartphones, and why eventually they will become the norm.

Personally I stick with mainstream encoding technologies like aac and mp3, simply to get longetivity out of conversions. I'm not one to re-rip my whole music collection just because a new super duper codec comes out (reason I haven't bothered with ogg). All kudos to audiophiles who do, but I'm not that fussy myself.

Now that I use my phone as music player I have started to convert to AAC. In my view, if a phone or hardware based player also supports aac, then it is atleast better than 90% of mp3 players that only support mp3, so to me the fact W800/K750 support aac makes them relatively advanced music players.

Real and wma are inferior proprietary codecs and I see no problem with a device not supporting them. Using dbpoweramp it is very very easy (and free) to rip hours of music from wma or real to aac or mp3.
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 02:37:31
Edit : Quote


K750/w800,... no are smartphones!




_________________
--Sony Ericsson Evolution--
T610 > K700i > K750 with R1N035!!
Free Mp3, Games, Themes and more go to...
http://es.groups.yahoo.com/group/SonyEricssonVenezuela

[ This Message was edited by: Manuel_max on 2005-09-30 02:04 ]
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 02:39:05
Edit : Quote


the k750i and w800i are lighter, thats a plus for any se fan
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 02:48:37
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2005-09-30 02:48:37, BONDIE_86 wrote:
the k750i and w800i are lighter, thats a plus for any se fan



Speaking of 'light' Which one has the 'lighter' price Amongst the three: Nokia 3250, K750i and the W800i
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 02:50:45
Edit : Quote


probally the k750i, if not then it has to be the nokia
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 03:00:35
Edit : Quote


@max_wedge:

agree with you that K750/W800 supported media format are sufficient for a music player. Only deficiencies I can see are the video and streaming format support, which should not matter to K750/W800 users because watching video on K750/W800 smallish screen just dont cut it.

i think it would be unfair (to you) to ask you to defend the K750/W800 purely on functionalities against the 3250 smartphone when hardware specs of both phones are similar.

To someone who place high priority on functionalities (like myself), 3250, or for a matter of fact any Series60 smartphhone, will always win by default. It is not that K750/W800 is no good but there is just too far behind to put up a decent fight (from functionality point of view).

But then again, not everyone understands or needs a smartphone or needs more functions. Some value forms/brands over brains (not that I am saying 3250 is lousy looking, in fact I think it is quite decent looking). It just boils down to individual preferences.




[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2005-09-30 04:01 ]
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 05:00:04
Edit : Quote


I agree with MIB, when it comes down to Java vs Symbian, it's a no-brainer. As for its mass, a few grams either way is irrelevant. It's all about personal choice. Let's wait till a comparative test can be done. I, for one, doubt that the camera will be as good as SE... This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 06:07:45
Edit : Quote


@bondie - So your fone is more expensive than mine I agree . . . But I have a feeling that the Nokia 3250's introductory price in the market will only level with that of the K750i.
--
Posted: 2005-09-30 15:30:27
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index