>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> k750 camera issue = IMPORTANT =
Bookmark topic
is k750 cmos or ccs? Which onez better? Wat to do wid my picture quality. Iam sorry for all the trouble.
--
Posted: 2005-11-05 18:36:03
Edit :
Quote
K750i uses CMOS... with regards to image quality CCD is better...
--
Posted: 2005-11-05 19:20:30
Edit :
Quote
generally true but the situation is changing. Some cmos chips are better quality than ccd counterparts. Some high end digital cameras are even getting cmos chips these days..
--
Posted: 2005-11-06 01:16:51
Edit :
Quote
Buddy,if you want a phone with a better camera look no further then the N90.When there is enough light the little k750i takes pictures of about the same quality as the N90.Under all other circumstances the k750i camera is below standard.Don't listen to all the crap the 'experts' gives you.A cmos cam can/does take nice pictures at night too.(look at the legendary Nokia7650 night pic quality to see what I mean) the problem with the k750i lies in the digital processing which is applied to the picture after has been taken.This has to be done on a k750i because the camera is not that good and otherwise the pic quality will be crap day and night.Unfortunately digital image processing only works if yout have a 'acceptable' picture to begin with.
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650
--
Posted: 2005-11-06 03:18:34
Edit :
Quote
You can see in this comparison of both phones how "good" the N90 is under "all other circumstances"
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia[....]onyericsson_w800-review-46.php
Just play around a little bit with the settings and practice untill you get better results. The camera in the K750 is quite good.
--
Posted: 2005-11-06 03:59:20
Edit :
Quote
SIMPLY USE the night mode function for sure!
this is taken by my K750i:
*those will come with "Creation Software: Photoshop 7.0" on their EXIF files, but i only resized them to fast upload on my photobucket. no other interpolations.
see?
this is the real ability of K750i cam. even much better than 'the all-round' N90.
--
Posted: 2005-11-06 07:00:28
Edit :
Quote
Now try taking a well focused macro picture (distance to lens around 1in) The k750i is just not up to it.The night mode is also not as good as some 'fans' pretend it to be.Look no further then the first post in this same tread.Also the focusing system is a bit to slow.Is not really point and shoot,but more like point wait a sec to focus and shoot.Never the less a very nice quality, cheap camera phone.I am not even mentioning the video 'quality'.Greetings from South Africa. Mario
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650
--
Posted: 2005-11-06 08:19:08
Edit :
Quote
sorry mario, but sometimes you really do annoy me with all your nokialoving c***. The original poster has a K750 and needed to verify if his K750 pictures were of normal quality or if there was something wrong. What good it is to him that you start posting your nonsense about the N90 camera, does that help him in any way in this thread ? does it have any relevance at all in this thread ?
No, it doesnt help and no, it has no relevance, its just you agitating your usual nokia stories.
This wasnt really a K750 camera versus N90 camera thread to begin with, but since you brought it up, then.
Both cameras are only mobile cams, both have their weaknesses and their strengts. It doesnt make any sense to point out one single area where one camera is better than the other.
Yes the N90 does better video, but we werent talking about video. Yes, the N90 makes better macroshots on distances below 1-2in, but the K750 makes better macroshots on distances from 2-4in.
No, the K750 do not have an especially slow focus, its as fast as any other mobile with auto focus (of which there are only very few), the rest simply just doesnt autofocus, they have a fixed focus where the only way to focus is for you to physically place yourself in the right distance according to the fixed focus before taking the picture. Thus most of the time they take crap out of focus pictures. The instant point and shoot idea with no focusing is for amateurs who doesnt know the difference.
And in regards to the N90 vs K750 debate, then in 80% of the normal circumstances and conditions where people usually take pictures, the K750 wins, making it the best overall camera.
The only circumstance where N90 is better is in macro below 1-2in which is why the nokia lovers usually only want to compare pictures of this kind every time I debate this with N90 owners.
Ive had this debate with N90 owners in other forums, and every time when I start posting non macro pictures and ask them to post similar from N90, they allways chicken out.
Therfore I dare you, do you even own a N90, or are you just posting claims you have no real knowledge about ? do you dare backing up your claims and post a series of N90 pictures you have taken with your N90 if you do have one ? then Ill gladly post some of my K750 pictures for comparison. or will you just chicken out like every other N90 owner I dared ?
--
Posted: 2005-11-06 12:02:03
Edit :
Quote
Yeah come on Mario, let's see 'em.
Note: the reason the N90 doesn't have auto focus - it's so heavy you can't hold it steady long enough for the cam to focus
--
Posted: 2005-11-06 12:24:51
Edit :
Quote
Amras.
Bro. Thanks for the help. Your pictures are really of great quality. K750 rocks. Can you do me a favour? Here. Check your software information by simply doing this - >*
Please let me know the firmware you are using. May be you have r1n035 and thats why you have so much clearer photos! They are amazing. Please man.
u take care
And u nokia freak! FCUK YOU
--
Posted: 2005-11-06 18:30:50
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
