>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> w900's graphic engine
Bookmark topic
@mysh I don't dissagree with what your saying at all.
If you read my original post properly your answer may have been different, which is what I picked up on. I said that "from what I had read at gsmarena" (as well as posting the link) that it doesn't "seem" to help.
Way off mark, I don't think so, perhaps my source material but as already said we have been through the performance figures and you have already confirmed results that favour the k750 and W800 in some areas although you have also pointed out that based on the higher resolution the nvidia is doing a pretty good job.
I appreciate that the w900 is out performing other models but even so there are still issues. I'm a games consul user and have been since the sega megadrive and NES. I have witnessed improvements in programming as people learn to program more efficiently. Unless specifically programmed for the w900 we may end up with games that do not harness the full potential of the phone. This has been the case with some pc games that have to be able to be used on a varying level of hardware.
Now if I were to dissagree to my original post I would have gone about it a different way and would have said that I dissagreed and felt that the source information was flawed and then explained why I felt that. I would have been happy with that
_________________
=
[ This Message was edited by: marlonski on 2006-02-04 20:36 ]
--
Posted: 2006-02-04 20:56:11
Edit :
Quote
hehe ok, i guess we do essentially agree, and i'm sorry if i came across saying you personally made wrong conclusions, when really it was your source for the info.
I don't trust much i see on gsmarena, their reviews are a bit light technically. And a lot of the user comments there are a comedy goldmine of misinformation!
About the w900i getting good programming support to get the most out of it, it should be ok. The API to access hardware accellerated 3D rendering is a java standard (JSR-?? i forget), plus it's using a popular nvidia mobile chip; nvidia get involved to see their chips are supported well by software.
anyway, you are right, i didn't read your first post properly, i just assumed your jbenchmark info came from the jbenchmark results site. I'll be more careful in future.
--
Posted: 2006-02-04 22:46:36
Edit :
Quote
@mysh no worries, thanks for your reply
--
Posted: 2006-02-17 18:51:14
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
