>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> SE M600 Vs Nokia E61
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2006-07-14 20:39:11, corentin wrote:
That being said, the m600i's touchscreen is really usefull!That's the selling point of the device since IMO, the thumboard of the e61 is head and shoulders above that of the m600i...
Hi Corentin,
Could you explain more on the thumboard...
Is E61 has more user friendly thumboard because the buttons are has nicely spaced out.
Which has better tactile feel on the buttons?
What could be the problems to say m600i has lousy thumboard?
--
Posted: 2006-08-03 10:11:46
Edit :
Quote
E61 is much bigger then the M600, the M fits much better in your pocket
--
Posted: 2006-08-03 10:18:52
Edit :
Quote
nokia = crap
sony ericsson = future
--
Posted: 2006-08-04 00:18:12
Edit :
Quote
DickySnapples Posts: > 500
Quote:
On 2006-08-04 00:18:12, jack77777 wrote:
nokia = crap
sony ericsson = future
yawn, that kind of statement is getting old. Nokia make alot of good phones.
--
Posted: 2006-08-04 00:21:02
Edit :
Quote
yea nokia are good , but in my opinion are trying too hard to cram everytying in to a phone , take a look at se they are laid back and produce music and camera handsets which excel at one thing (usally) , nokia cram all this in , but miss out on such things they need to take time on their phones eg: nokia n90 was ment to be camera phone the camera was poor , se released a k750i and it is a brilliant camera.
--
Posted: 2006-08-04 00:36:04
Edit :
Quote
deal breaker: WIFI
--
Posted: 2006-11-21 02:58:57
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
