>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> Who would win?
Bookmark topic
@qvga
i think thread starter means who is the most technologically advanced in general. He is not asking who produces most advanced phones, thats an obvious answer isnt it......
is not behind at all, they just dont implement it into their phones like nokia.... and as far as samsung and motorola go, i dont see how they are that far ahead of
technolgically, they have not shown much.... only thinness.... Maybe Samsung as a general electronics company, ie, tv's etc....
Saying
is way behind is incorrect imo.....
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:18:38
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-20 13:18:38, >500 wrote:
@qvga
i think thread starter means who is the most technologically advanced in general. He is not asking who produces most advanced phones, thats an obvious answer isnt it......
is not behind at all, they just dont implement it into their phones like nokia.... and as far as samsung and motorola go, i dont see how they are that far ahead of
technolgically, they have not shown much.... only thinness.... Maybe Samsung as a general electronics company, ie, tv's etc....
Saying
is way behind is incorrect imo.....
if they have the technology, where is it? because its not in any of their phones.
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:21:08
Edit :
Quote
i still belive, that /// has one of the most advanced knowledge according mobile technology, but dont really get, why isnt it important for se to use ///s experiences
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:21:47
Edit :
Quote
It could be that there is no proper planning or they are weak in their designing dept.
Lets not forget even a gaint like Canon is not in the cell market at all......
Maybe SE is waiting for its time to come..............
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:24:57
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-20 13:24:57, mailboxmanoj wrote:
It could be that there is no proper planning or they are weak in their designing dept.
Lets not forget even a gaint like Canon is not in the cell market at all......
Maybe SE is waiting for its time to come..............
and whilst they wait, nokia is churning up profits and getting even further ahead in the tech dep.
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:26:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-20 13:21:08, QVGA wrote:
On 2007-05-20 13:18:38, >500 wrote:
@qvga
i think thread starter means who is the most technologically advanced in general. He is not asking who produces most advanced phones, thats an obvious answer isnt it......
is not behind at all, they just dont implement it into their phones like nokia.... and as far as samsung and motorola go, i dont see how they are that far ahead of
technolgically, they have not shown much.... only thinness.... Maybe Samsung as a general electronics company, ie, tv's etc....
Saying
is way behind is incorrect imo.....
if they have the technology, where is it? because its not in any of their phones.
I don't care what you posted earlier on, but THAT question, was stupid. Everybody knows that
is going for midend phones this year. EVERBODY. Of course they have the same "amount" of technology as Nokia, they just don't think that's what their buyers are looking for. And in most cases, they're not. The only reason Nokia is doing this, is because they've these advanced series such as N-series and E-series. If it wasn't for those series, Nokia would still be doing mostly midend phones.
Wait and see, Sofia will show that they have the technology, that you're talking about. They're just not interested in being number 1, just face it.
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:26:25
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-20 13:26:25, thecoolsha wrote:
On 2007-05-20 13:21:08, QVGA wrote:
On 2007-05-20 13:18:38, >500 wrote:
@qvga
i think thread starter means who is the most technologically advanced in general. He is not asking who produces most advanced phones, thats an obvious answer isnt it......
is not behind at all, they just dont implement it into their phones like nokia.... and as far as samsung and motorola go, i dont see how they are that far ahead of
technolgically, they have not shown much.... only thinness.... Maybe Samsung as a general electronics company, ie, tv's etc....
Saying
is way behind is incorrect imo.....
if they have the technology, where is it? because its not in any of their phones.
I don't care what you posted earlier on, but THAT question, was stupid. Everybody knows that
is going for midend phones this year. EVERBODY. Of course they have the same "amount" of technology as Nokia, they just don't think that's what their buyers are looking for. And in most cases, they're not. The only reason Nokia is doing this, is because they've these advanced series such as N-series and E-series. If it wasn't for those series, Nokia would still be doing mostly midend phones.
Wait and see, Sofia will show that they have the technology, that you're talking about. They're just not interested in being number 1, just face it.
without sofia being a smartphone, they can never ever hope to be in competition with Nokia.
smartphone = smart
java based = not so smart.
Midend phones "this year"? can you name one 'high end' phone that sold well and was problem free in "any" year that SE sold?
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:31:57
Edit :
Quote
@QVGA
dude, why are you comparing non smartphones and smartphones??
No, I can't. All phones have small errors / bugs to start off with. ALL. Every manufacturer sends out new firmwares repairing bugs etc.
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:39:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-20 13:39:40, thecoolsha wrote:
@QVGA
dude, why are you comparing non smartphones and smartphones??
i am comparing SE with Nokia. now if nokia makes smartphones, no one is stopping SE from doing so
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:43:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-20 13:43:04, QVGA wrote:
On 2007-05-20 13:39:40, thecoolsha wrote:
@QVGA
dude, why are you comparing non smartphones and smartphones??
i am comparing SE with Nokia. now if nokia makes smartphones, no one is stopping SE from doing so
And by doing that, you're comparing non smartphones with smartphones. i dont wanna discuss this with you, you're too big a fanboy.
--
Posted: 2007-05-20 13:45:34
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
