>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902
Bookmark topic
WOW! Nice one NOKIA
no matter how ugly the 6220c is it DOES NOT change the fact that NOKIA have better image quality. C902 doesnt look any better either
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 16:34:03
Edit :
Quote
Ah man, SE! I give up. Cybershit is its new name as far as Im concerned.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 17:30:13
Edit :
Quote
Well, guys, there has been a new firmware release for the C902. Maybe these pics were shot with the old one.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 17:35:07
Edit :
Quote
no matter how much firmware it gets i dont think it can get near to the level of classic
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 17:55:18
Edit :
Quote
Holy s**t what the heck is up with the cam of c902.
I can't believe that this is a cybershot.
This is just sad but true (metallica
).
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 18:25:10
Edit :
Quote
Sorry but I don't buy that at all. I've seen much better pics elsewhere.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 18:26:27
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-19 17:35:07, NightBlade wrote:
Well, guys, there has been a new firmware release for the C902. Maybe these pics were shot with the old one.
New firmware
doesn't guarantee the better camera.
We all experienced that one previously in K850.
The pics from C902 reminds me of K850 : there's still a red-pink conversion and wash out.
Sad but true.
Come on...
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 19:18:34
Edit :
Quote
Have to agree with Rifqi_Aziz, the pic quality is very similar to my K850i
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 19:30:08
Edit :
Quote
yea. nokia's much better.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 19:37:35
Edit :
Quote
Nokia learns much. SE seems not!
Sony please withdraw Cyber-hot sub-brand from SE! Walkman is much more than enough for SE, lol
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 19:51:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
