>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> Nokia 6220 Classic or SE C902 ?
Bookmark topic
The C902 has good picture quality for a small phone, judging by its picture thread. The problem is the fact the screen is too small to make a good viewfinder. You don't need to use the phone to know that. Also, the lack of a xenon flash it also a downside.
[ This Message was edited by: nikolat on 2008-07-19 20:36 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-19 21:35:21
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-10 21:56:47, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-07-10 21:44:40, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-07-10 21:41:18, xironghostx wrote:
The nokia is way better at taking nice pictures and videos.
Yet, it's pretty darn ugly...
yeah yeah we get it already. you have the same one liner for all nokia related phones.
And for a reason.
--
Posted: 2008-07-19 23:13:37
Edit :
Quote
DickySnapples Posts: > 500
On 2008-07-19 23:13:37, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-07-10 21:56:47, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-07-10 21:44:40, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-07-10 21:41:18, xironghostx wrote:
The nokia is way better at taking nice pictures and videos.
Yet, it's pretty darn ugly...
yeah yeah we get it already. you have the same one liner for all nokia related phones.
And for a reason.
your a biased idiot?
--
Posted: 2008-07-19 23:14:53
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-10 21:44:40, NightBlade wrote:
Yet, it's pretty darn ugly...
Don't forget to add - "IMHO" - at the end of your sentence next time. But, seriously, the 6220 is beautiful and classy and has the specs to match it's looks too, IMHO!
--
Posted: 2008-07-19 23:19:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-19 23:14:53, Dicky Snapples wrote:
your a biased idiot?
Biased? Maybe.
Idiot? Far from it.
And of course it's just my opinion. Anyone with as much as 2 brain cells in his head would be able to come to that conclusion.
--
Posted: 2008-07-19 23:31:05
Edit :
Quote
Must warn you for 6220's crap buttons. They give a very plastic sound and I have had plenty of customers whose keys been loose/broken. It appear to be the new s500/w580... :/
--
Posted: 2008-07-20 00:06:05
Edit :
Quote
the 6220's looks is boring and ugly. it's made of cheap plastic, but hey, it has great features and for a relatively cheap price also. but it looks really boring.
--
Posted: 2008-07-20 04:33:14
Edit :
Quote
the 6220 has a couple extra specs....
i was going to get one through work. but my word, the build quality is quite bad imho
i know
arent that great for build, k850 for example. that went bad after a bit of use. But with the 6220, it creaks straight of the box. and the phone is held together by clips (i think i read somewhere), not screws.
on the other hand, the c902 is made of metal, i think. sure feels like it. or extrememly solid plastic.
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2008-07-20 06:33 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-20 05:41:44
Edit :
Quote
I would recommend you Sony Ericsson C902 because Sony series wins hands down always. this is an Ultra-compact, stylish and with a unique lens cover that slides open to reveal the 5.0 megapixel Auto Focus camera. With the C902 Cyber-shot you can be confident of getting the perfect shot. The Sony Ericsson C902 Cyber-shot comes with a 160MB built-in memory – the equivalent of storage for up to 100 full resolution photos. i think this will be better.
Thanks.
--
Posted: 2008-07-25 15:39:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-25 15:39:40, angelinalove wrote:
I would recommend you Sony Ericsson C902 because Sony series wins hands down always. this is an Ultra-compact, stylish and with a unique lens cover that slides open to reveal the 5.0 megapixel Auto Focus camera. With the C902 Cyber-shot you can be confident of getting the perfect shot. The Sony Ericsson C902 Cyber-shot comes with a 160MB built-in memory – the equivalent of storage for up to 100 full resolution photos. i think this will be better.
Thanks.
No offense, but did you get this from somewhere?
The perfect shot part reminds me of the SE site.
--
Posted: 2008-07-25 17:22:34
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
