>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Hard to choose:Moto ZN5, SE C902, SE K850i
Bookmark topic
Go for C902.
--
Posted: 2009-02-04 17:55:25
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-04 17:55:25, Rifqi_Aziz wrote:
Go for C902.
And supposedly i should follow your advice?..based on WHAT?
I saw that crash test...and read the full article.
So to sum it up the ZN5 is a tough phone with well built "insides", also I found out that it has too a mineral glass protection for the display (1 up).
As far as it's now the ZN5 is the winner...still got some time to make up my mind.
And please bring good arguments on you opinion
_________________
I expect nothing. I fear no one. I am free.
[ This Message was edited by: alexander87 on 2009-02-04 17:22 ]
[ This Message was edited by: alexander87 on 2009-02-04 17:23 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-04 18:21:42
Edit :
Quote
well that's the right choice....but did you consider the N82?
--
Posted: 2009-02-04 19:16:48
Edit :
Quote
N82...nah, no Nokia for this time around thanks
--
Posted: 2009-02-04 19:19:49
Edit :
Quote
In most respects the moto zn5 is much better in features, 3.5mm earphone jack, i've heard its flash( and camera in general) is comparable or better than the n82 which in turn is better than the k850i. And it has good build quality to boot....But i'm gonna pull a jeremy clarkson and say i wouldn't buy one
I used to be a dedicated SE-only user. Then 3-4 years ago i stopped and went through a line of Nokia's and Motorola's and then came back to SE now with a problem free k850i. I came to one conclusion: Boy does it feel good to come back to using SE.
I don't know about the newer ones but the Moto's i had were terrible to use.
I like to say it's about priorities, my main priorities being looks and fun and easy of use. where i say the k850i(love or hate, but for me it's got the "wow" factor) and c902(classy) look better than the zn5 and are much better to use, features aren't lagging by that much either. But that's my opinion seems you're set on the zn5 but that's my 2c for u to consider
--
Posted: 2009-02-04 22:16:40
Edit :
Quote
yup...i catch your drift dude
this is the fact that is making me think over and over abt this move
i've never used a moto before and a change of things sounds better (linux hehe)
but being such a long time user of SE puts me to wonder if i'll find the same user friendliness i find in SE's with which i'm very used to (used to as also a bit bored of)
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 10:19:18
Edit :
Quote
haha well i find SE's interface the most "un-boring". That said i've only been back to SE for around 3 months unlike you who has been using them continously for much longer
So in your case...change is good

, if you're the type that changes phones once or twice a year, even if you don't like the purchase the mistake won't be long lived.
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 10:45:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-05 19:26:01, King9 wrote:
On 2009-02-04 22:16:40, enk39 wrote:
In most respects the moto zn5 is much better in features, 3.5mm earphone jack, i've heard its flash( and camera in general) is comparable or better than the n82 which in turn is better than the k850i. And it has good build quality to boot....But i'm gonna pull a jeremy clarkson and say i wouldn't buy one
?
i read about zn5 flash and it was not very good, it have "burn" issues (make you pictures to bleached sometimes).
but the biggest point is that zn5 is absolutley UGLY ! (it looks just ridicolous with its touchkeys and ugly plastic-design).
sure i have seen quite many good pictures bu zn5 Kodak camera, but thats the only point with this phone.
c902 have better design and also (like zn5) a good camera, i would easily go for c902 here.
zn5 got 500Mhz cpu, Wlan, larger screen, 3.5mm port and real xenonflash.
The only down with zn5 is the lack of UMTS and HSDPA.
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 19:30:21
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-04 22:16:40, enk39 wrote:
In most respects the moto zn5 is much better in features, 3.5mm earphone jack, i've heard its flash( and camera in general) is comparable or better than the n82 which in turn is better than the k850i. And it has good build quality to boot....But i'm gonna pull a jeremy clarkson and say i wouldn't buy one
?
i read about zn5 flash and it was not very good, it have "burn" issues (make you pictures to bleached sometimes).
but the biggest point is that zn5 is absolutley UGLY ! (it looks just ridicolous with its touchkeys and ugly plastic-design, [looks like Moto had a budget on £10 when they designed zn5 casing]).
sure i have seen quite many good pictures by zn5 Kodak camera, but thats the only point with this phone.
c902 have better design and also (like zn5) a good camera, i would easily go for c902 here. [even K850 looks so much better then zn5 and have at least a good flash (with proper software/firmware)]
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 19:38:00
Edit :
Quote
What's hard about these choices?
A Motorola
A stylish, well specced

camphone used by 007
The second worst

(after the P990) which has only recently become tolerable.
Hmmm... lets see... ummm...
_________________
Voted
Best Phone Review Esato Awards 2008!
[ This Message was edited by: carkitter on 2009-02-06 07:01 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-06 07:57:55
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply