>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SE C905 vs Canon EOS 350! Camera Shoot-out !
Bookmark topic
something is very wrong here....
Or pics of Canon are chosen in purpose to discqualifeid Canon, and some bad examples are use it for compare,
or is Canon piece of shit... (which can't be )
Otherwise,
it's nice to see such a comparasition... When I say to people who are interested in my photos, that I'm actually taking pics with my mobile,
they just say WOOW .... They actually can't believe it.... It's so unreal that some mobile phone
do such a photo.... Yes it can... I got hundreds of them....
But this here...is quite suspicious ...
OK, let's face it.... C905 can do such a good pics,
but Canon can't do such a bad pics
[ This Message was edited by: panonski on 2009-03-17 01:16 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 02:15:01
Edit :
Quote
I'm sorry this thread is worthless
Every one of the C905i exposures has a colour cast, and not a single one of the 350D shots is in focus.
What lens did you use? What focal length and aperture settings?
[ This Message was edited by: frankthetank on 2009-03-17 07:40 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 08:35:00
Edit :
Quote
Well as I said. I own c905 but not EOS350. I had it for an hour or two and that is result. I can comfirm that someone who use EOS350 daily can take much better pictures than me
I am not familiar with camera and my test was to take amateur pictures with both phone and Canon. (I guess that more than 90% of people who take pictures are amateurs like me). I am sure that some PRO photographer can change settings in Canon as it should be. On the other hand, I have a lot of friends that have DSLR and most of the time they use "auto" and do not bother with settings. (and yes there is a lot of blurry images)
Anyway I am happy with my c905. There is a LOT people here on forum that are complaining about this and that and everything. Most of the time after I take pictures I resize it to some size that is OK to send in e-mail and they look great. From time to time I order some prints and c905 pictures sure look great on paper.
Thanks for listening!
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 08:39:41
Edit :
Quote
frankthetank > I used standard Canon lens I think it is 18/55 mm and I zoomed a little to reach about same size as with c905. Focus is somewhere in the middle and objecst further away are blurry, I think that is called depht of field. But just like I said that was NOT professional comparision and I must agree with You that it could be better focus, sorry. May I ask You for some help. May be You have some frind with DSLR and can take some pictures to compare. I guess You can do that more professionaly.
Thanks !
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 09:25:50
Edit :
Quote
So to conclude in the hands of a newbie the Canon takes less pretty shots than the C905. Not very surprising tbh. You need to learn a lot to use even basic dSLR functions and features, it is not so much a point and shoot camera as a mid-range digicam.
I also don't subscribe to the opinion that the C905 is little behind a Canon EOS, because that would automatically imply that it is miles better than most medium and high range normal digicams. Nevertheless its fun to have shoot outs
I would like to see a shootout between mid/high end camera phones vs. mid/high end digicams (no dSLRs).
Edit:
Have a look at these:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/CanonEOS350D/page29.asp[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-03-17 08:48 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 09:46:29
Edit :
Quote
there is nothing wrong with EOS pics, focus point is selected to close but everything else is just depth-of-field effect. if you take a look at pics of girl or trees, where focus point is far and depth of field don't have to be shallow, you won't find this effect
So to conclude in the hands of a newbie the Canon takes less pretty shots than the C905
half true
only because of C905 which can't create shallow depth of field and most pics seems to be "sharpner"
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-03-17 09:01 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 09:58:22
Edit :
Quote
If someone is happy loan me a C905i for a bit, I'll compare it with my DSLR fitted with a prime lens @ fixed aperture of f2.8
I only have K850i with which to compare - the fact that it inspired me (through it's failings) to buy a DSLR is almost proof enough lol
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 09:59:29
Edit :
Quote
but f/2.8 is totally different in C905 and lens for DSLR
you have to find equivalent above f/5.0
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-03-17 09:07 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 10:02:41
Edit :
Quote
frankthetank "If someone is happy loan me a C905i for a bit..."
I can do that, are You here in Sweden?
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 10:15:14
Edit :
Quote
Semi off topic, would it be possible to save images on the phone unprocessed? Like RAW images on the better digicams? That could make a big difference for those who like to process the images themselves (me included).
--
Posted: 2009-03-17 10:20:34
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
