>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Shootout: C702 vs C902 vs N95
Bookmark topic
The landscape shots are missing alot of detail look a little flat and over processed and aren't eye pleasing, the macros are ok but still a little over processed , most compacts over process there photos you won't find 1 that doesn't, it does have a good lens though and keeps the sharpness the same corner to corner alot of cams don't and have bad barrel disortion at full wide angle, dymanic range seems a bit limted like my old p100.
The c902 landscape pics are very sharp and nice to look at, even though a bit oversharpend and alot of fringing , the C702 seems to have a poor lens on the first landscape pic it blurred the entire right hand side while the rest of the pic is nice and sharp, mine would do the same but not all the time which is werid just when it feels like it. With the macros the C702 preformed the best very sharp and nicely focused, you should do some lower light pics then the phones will stop winning.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 12:12:35
Edit :
Quote
Hopefully this won't turn into one of those fanboy wars >.>
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 13:00:18
Edit :
Quote
^^^ I hope so too >_
Its just a comparison of pictures taken by me, I will do some low light shots later. 100% crops need to be done too. So much work
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 13:09:58
Edit :
Quote
if i had to vote for the best pictures:
1- c902
2- c702
3- n95
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 14:17:25
Edit :
Quote
c902 have better colours, sharpness.......
c702 is good in macro (a bit blurred in larger views, otherwise really ok)......
N95...well, what can i say, NOKIA colours all the way,(mixed quality).....im not impressed......
edit....
i agree Tranced...c702 actaully beats N95.... (because of much better macro, etc
)
ps.... Blerk, I see c902 use latest R3EA038, thats one of the reasons c902 beats N95
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-30 13:45 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 14:18:46
Edit :
Quote
1. C902
2.C702
3.n95
Blerk have you tried Number1's cam driver in the test , been playing with it all morning and getting some very plesant results.
really suprised on the N95 posting a bad score mind .
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 14:41:34
Edit :
Quote
The colours of the N95 are very bland out of the box yes. But easy to fix with an imaging program, adjust the levels and its as vibrant as the SE models. All drivers used are stock. No modifications.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 14:44:18
Edit :
Quote
(oohps...sorry Nokia)
100% crops
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-30 13:48 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 14:46:21
Edit :
Quote
NExt up do a comparison of 7610 with a C905.
Then a 3310 without a camera with an XPERIA.
Then an empty nokia box with C905.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 18:24:40
Edit :
Quote
Lol QVGA, I don't know what you meant by that but it made me chuckle. If its unfair I put the N95 in there, I'm sorry it is all I got. To be fair once you normalise the levels the N95 pictures are just fine. I didn't have any other Nokia's to try and I heard the camera module is still used in newer models. The N82 (not that new) also uses it with the addition of xenon which would've made no difference in the little shoot out.
Edit: I'm open to do any sort of comparison just PM me for my address and send me the camera phone
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-04-30 20:55 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 21:53:56
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
