News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Other manufacturers > Nokia apparently loves fish. A lot. Bookmark topic


Excuse me but where has SE moved on? A200 is an ancient platform introduced god knows when! It has multi tasking and thats the only thing it has going for it. The most SE does with its interface is add gimmicky and childish looking flash themes.
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 19:36:25
Edit : Quote


hello???????????? a200 is eons old???
man! you should seriosly check out new phones!!!
they've got media menu, aktivity menu, youtube integrated, and its all really fast...
and everything is so easy to use.
and its very very stable...

lotsa my friends s40 get hanged now-n-then...
new nokia phones with s40 have just got some updates like musik-player look....

but s40 has some good features, i am not saying its bad, just that they need to put in major updates...
like aktivity menu, and stop making cheap casings....
a2 menu's are really slick to look and feel, and the phone build quality is awesome too...
nokia s40 serie phones havent got better java, now can they multi-task
THEY CANT MULTI-TASK!!!!
what more you want as negative point?
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 19:54:23
Edit : Quote


How about this: S40 isnt really Nokia's thing just like Smartphone isnt SE's.
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 20:39:46
Edit : Quote


we all know about that....
but in a debate, this statement is invalid!!!!!

so, you agree s40 doesnt really rock , dont you
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 20:47:55
Edit : Quote


Who cares? Honestly, who cares? The reason why s40 sells so much is because its cheap, simple, stable and fast to develop. Compare a 6300 to a K850, or a 5610xm to W910. At the end of the day the XM S40 phones have audio hardware (3.5mm jack, seperate audio keys, DSP DAC) and do what they are meant to very well,did K850 and W910 do that? Nope,and im pretty sure S40 phones totaly out sell a200s so why should Nokia change anything? You want a phone with excellent funcionality? Get an S60. You want simplicity? S40. End of story.



--
Posted: 2009-05-27 21:07:29
Edit : Quote


oy! hello! this aint a marketting strategy thread... we are technicall people!
so dont say who cares!
at the end of the day, its the perpective of those who buy the phones.. if someone doesnt mind that s40 doesnt have multitasking, then there's no point on arguing with them...
however, if someone is debating about s40vs sumthng else, then the debate has a meaning...
cause the plus and minus points come out.
and the debaters both get to know more things about the topics...
right QVGA???

and s40 is cheap??????????
man! that was funny! cheap compared to what? 20,000? thats even more funnier!!!!
compare nok s40 with same range phone..
SE still has multi-tasking...
and if the phone is Walkman, it beats it in musik, and if its Cyber-shot, it beats it in Pictures...
and they sell, cause people buy them... its more because of nokia's marketting..
not not all phones have 3.5mm jacks.. just the few new ones... and their build quality is like 4/10 whereas SE has truly stylish build quality..#like look at the w350, personally i think the phone is a wastage! but it is just so stylish...

k850 is brillian!!!! the camera is top-class... its got mediaplayer3.... superb interface....
it totally did what it was did to... it just raised the bar for other phones....

simplicity with s40? ya maybe you have a point,,,
the phone is too simple for guys who like to have something solid,,,
thats why maybe it sells with so many people, because they cant handle sophistication...
sophistication is very good, if you know how to use it.
my dad still insists on a nokia, just because he doesnt know how to use so many functions... and many other people have similar views..

however, when a phone vs phone comparison is made, s40 lags behind...
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 21:21:19
Edit : Quote


once again, WHO CARES? The majority of s40 users dont even care for such things. XM phones have superior audio quality to the Walkmans atleast 5610xm vs. W910, yes S40 is cheap, the majority of s40 phones are cheap, NOKIA 5000 is cheaper than any low end SE, and SE phones just suck at holding their value. Yes a200 can multitask but not very well especialy when you add Media App and heavy web pages so it becomes pointless on a a200 anyway. Not going to argue with you, you shout all the time, WTF is up with the : !!! ?.
Personaly id prefer a200 over s40, but i have a S60,so both a200 and s40 are crap and suck in my book.



--
Posted: 2009-05-27 21:49:02
Edit : Quote


yes, s60 ranks tops in my book too!!!!!
and i shout, but i still make a point!
you swear, are arrogant to the bit, and have no debating spirit!
cheap means the build quality, and they arent less priced than SE...
check market stats...

the point is not whether the s40 users mind all these things, its simple, cause if they did, they would have not bought s40 in the first place...
and one phone vs another phone wont solve the issue of s40 vs SE....
its all of s40 vs all of SE...

and any phone can be brought to its knees with heavy apps... even s60. i think you arent aware much about phones... like their processos or rams... or even how they handle apps...

so, in that case, i stop this debate with a note that i refuse to debate with someone who doesnt have a valid point to make...

let the original topic be carried on..

further clashes can be maid via pm' or a new topic.
hope my friend guci will comply!
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 22:18:05
Edit : Quote


Yep,and was arrogant enough not to finish reading your post please tell me of a new SE phone thats cheaper than NOKIA 3500c ,1661 OR 1680? That has similar features. Thanx
And im pretty aware of phones hardware,just find your arguement pointless.
--
Posted: 2009-05-27 23:04:13
Edit : Quote



same here...
and as i already concluded, im done debating with you mate!

--
Posted: 2009-05-27 23:54:21
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index