Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : sony ericsson t68i vs samsung sgh-t100 (was OMG! You have to see this!!!!!!!!!!)
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> sony ericsson t68i vs samsung sgh-t100 (was OMG! You have to see this!!!!!!!!!!)
Bookmark topic
read the review again. even if you have not dropped the phone it has bugs. i have not dropped my phone yet deltayoda and it is impossible that i will not drop it ever. nobody's perfect you know. i am now thinking if i will get the t68i for myself but i will just have to wait for other manufacturers to release their's and make a comparison depending primarily on my needs. i may get the t68i for my wife on her upcoming birthday though. it is just normal to say that our your phone is great for you and we all are entitled to our own opinions like the guy who reviewes the 2 phones. his article is the result.
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 05:49:00
Edit :
Quote
T68 sets the benchmark for colour screen phone, so i give it a benchmark value of 1.
Based on what I read from the technical specs, functionality of T100, I give this phone a benkmark value of 0.95.
This is only my opinion
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 06:00:00
Edit :
Quote
only 12 bit screen , nothing more is better....
it was said , its a basic phone comparing to the t68i..
i think its more to take attention of girls and teens...
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 07:29:00
Edit :
Quote
hey cool! at least i get to know more girls than before. if only the t68i can display more colors on the screen like the t100. 12 bit 4096 is better than 256 color display. i saw the display comparison and it is very clear that the t68i's screen is no match for the t100. it's true, it's true.
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 08:52:00
Edit :
Quote
it is true that the t100 has better resolution ... but then .. all you get is the better screen ... and you r loosing tons of great function that you might need when G3 is out ... hehehe so .. you can think about it ..
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 09:25:00
Edit :
Quote
T68 for me please...
Ok the T100 does have a very good display, much better than T68... but the screen only does not make you a winner. They are missing out of these phone IRda, Bluetooth, MMS (I think) etc... I mean, how am I supposed to connect my iPAQ3870 with T100? Do u see the problem?
T100 is a good looking mobile... but just for talking or WAPping, not serious business. Also there is a hefty price tag for T100.... it's about 270 pounds with a contract... wow... holly crap!!! I guess it's price will come down in a few months, but it's way expensive.
Also how about the battery? I think TFTs consume more energy than STNs (t68).
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 11:56:00
Edit :
Quote
Shesh..everybody's talking abou the features, techologies, colour pixels etc. Didn't you take a look at T100's appearance?
The external antenna is sooo UGLY. The buttons are huge and flat. Externally its no match for the T68 i or m or whatever. Imagine having to open a little door everytime you get a call or you wanna use it. Then you cant talk about size since its double the T68 when opened.
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 13:18:00
Edit :
Quote
Yup, the T100 has an ugly antenna and I think that most phones in the future will be clam-type as this is the only way to squeeze in a bigger screen without making the buttons too small.
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 15:10:00
Edit :
Quote
Havenīt seen such an ugly movile since all those Triums models but this is No1 I could never have this one with me
Nothing yet like my gold T68m a winner in design.
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 16:03:00
Edit :
Quote
I agree totally, that phone is soooo ugly. Im proud of taking out my T68, its an amazing phone. That samsung is bloody disgusting, i would keep my T68 any day. :-)
This post was posted from a T68
--
Posted: 2002-04-20 18:32:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
